瘘管剥除括约肌挂浮线引流术治疗高位肛瘘的临床研究
发布时间:2019-03-30 14:03
【摘要】:目的:设计“瘘管剥除括约肌挂浮线引流术”治疗高位肛瘘,并与传统的“瘘管切开挂线引流术”治疗高位肛瘘进行对照,探讨瘘管剥除括约肌挂浮线引流术治疗高位肛瘘的临床疗效和安全性。方法:纳入符合诊断标准的高位肛瘘病例40例,随机分成治疗组和对照组,其中瘘管剥除括约肌挂浮线引流术组(治疗组)20例,瘘管切开挂线引流术组(对照组)20例。观察两组在治愈率、复发率、愈合时间、肛门功能、肛管动力学、术后并发症及后遗症方面的差异。结果:两组在创面治愈率、尿潴留方面差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。两组在术后第3、7天疼痛情况有差异(P0.05),第14天疼痛情况无差异(P0.05),治疗组疼痛情况较轻(以术后第3、7天为明显)。两组在愈合时间、肛管动力学、肛门功能方面差异有统计学意义(P0.05),治疗组优于对照组。治疗组和对照组均临床痊愈,随访半年两组均无复发。结论:瘘管剥除括约肌挂浮线引流术治疗高位肛瘘与瘘管切开挂线引流术相比,治愈率相当,但术后疼痛轻,愈合时间缩短,能很好的维持肛门正常形态、保护肛门功能。
[Abstract]:Objective: to design the "Fistula exfoliation sphincter floating line drainage" for the treatment of high anal fistula, and to compare it with the traditional "fistula incision and drainage" in the treatment of high anal fistula. To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of sphincter drainage in the treatment of high anal fistula. Methods: 40 cases of high anal fistula were randomly divided into treatment group (n = 20) and control group (n = 20). There were 20 cases in group A (n = 20) and group B (n = 20) in which sphincter was removed from sphincter. The differences of cure rate, recurrence rate, healing time, anal function, anal dynamics, postoperative complications and sequelae between the two groups were observed. Results: there was no significant difference in wound cure rate and urine retention between the two groups (P0.05). The pain of the two groups was different on the 3rd and 7th day after operation (P0.05), and there was no difference on the 14th day (P0.05). The pain in the treatment group was mild (especially on the 3rd and 7th day after operation). There were significant differences in healing time, anal dynamics and anal function between the two groups (P0.05), and the treatment group was superior to the control group. Both the treatment group and the control group were cured and there was no recurrence in the two groups after half a year of follow-up. Conclusion: the curative rate of fistula exfoliation sphincter floating line drainage is similar to that of fistula incision and thread drainage, but the pain after operation is light, the healing time is shortened, and it can maintain the normal shape of anus and protect anal function. [WT5 "HZ] conclusion:\?
【学位授予单位】:川北医学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:R657.16
本文编号:2450151
[Abstract]:Objective: to design the "Fistula exfoliation sphincter floating line drainage" for the treatment of high anal fistula, and to compare it with the traditional "fistula incision and drainage" in the treatment of high anal fistula. To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of sphincter drainage in the treatment of high anal fistula. Methods: 40 cases of high anal fistula were randomly divided into treatment group (n = 20) and control group (n = 20). There were 20 cases in group A (n = 20) and group B (n = 20) in which sphincter was removed from sphincter. The differences of cure rate, recurrence rate, healing time, anal function, anal dynamics, postoperative complications and sequelae between the two groups were observed. Results: there was no significant difference in wound cure rate and urine retention between the two groups (P0.05). The pain of the two groups was different on the 3rd and 7th day after operation (P0.05), and there was no difference on the 14th day (P0.05). The pain in the treatment group was mild (especially on the 3rd and 7th day after operation). There were significant differences in healing time, anal dynamics and anal function between the two groups (P0.05), and the treatment group was superior to the control group. Both the treatment group and the control group were cured and there was no recurrence in the two groups after half a year of follow-up. Conclusion: the curative rate of fistula exfoliation sphincter floating line drainage is similar to that of fistula incision and thread drainage, but the pain after operation is light, the healing time is shortened, and it can maintain the normal shape of anus and protect anal function. [WT5 "HZ] conclusion:\?
【学位授予单位】:川北医学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:R657.16
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张东铭;肛直肠控便机理研究进展[J];大肠肛门病外科杂志;1998年04期
2 张书信;;肛门内括约肌解剖生理学研究进展[J];结直肠肛门外科;2006年01期
3 吴至久;唐学贵;杜丽娟;;切开挂线对口引流对高位后马蹄形肛瘘肛门功能保护作用临床研究[J];结直肠肛门外科;2013年04期
4 陈永强;杨光;张卓军;吴雄辉;;切开挂线术治疗复杂肛瘘中的临床疗效观察[J];结直肠肛门外科;2013年04期
5 曾冬梅;黄惠平;吕小平;余成栋;;高频及直肠腔内超声在肛瘘诊断中的应用价值[J];广西中医药大学学报;2014年02期
6 钱海华;;论实挂与虚挂[J];江苏中医药;2006年08期
7 万廷军;;旷置加切开挂线治疗肛瘘的临床观察及疗效分析[J];中外医疗;2013年06期
8 戴民勇;;切开挂线法治疗高位复杂性肛瘘[J];人人健康(医学导刊);2008年02期
9 李春雨;张丹丹;王军;徐晓叶;范庆;聂敏;;二种手术方式治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的疗效比较[J];山西医药杂志;2008年01期
10 傅文杰;薛彦俊;汤东;孟荣贵;;肛瘘管剥离、内口缝扎、直肠粘膜瓣滑动前移治疗高位复杂性肛瘘20例[J];武警医学院学报;2009年11期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 郑丽华;安阿sピ擞玫臀磺锌呶豢踔梅ㄖ瘟聘呶桓仞木樽芙峒傲俅惭芯縖D];中国中医科学院;2013年
,本文编号:2450151
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/2450151.html
最近更新
教材专著