经伤椎置钉与跨伤椎置钉对胸腰椎骨折疗效的观察
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare the imaging morphology and recovery of related factors in thoracolumbar fracture patients by two kinds of treatment methods: transected vertebral nail and trans-injured vertebral nail, and compared the imaging morphology and related factors of thoracolumbar fracture patients after operation. To explore the morphological changes of thoracolumbar fractures and the corresponding clinical effects of two different treatment methods. Methods: from March 2010 to March 2014, 40 patients with thoracolumbar spine fracture were selected and divided into two groups: experimental group (n = 20), control group (n = 20) and control group (n = 20), and the patients with thoracolumbar spine fracture were divided into experimental group (n = 20) and control group (n = 20). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the height of vertebral body (including the anterior and posterior edges), the spinal Cobb angle of the injured vertebral segment and the pain degree of the injured site. In the experimental group, the short-segment transected vertebral nail was used in the experimental group, and the traditional short-segment transposition nail was used in the control group. The operation was performed by the same operator and assistant, and the materials of the nail-rod system were all purchased from the same manufacturer. After operation and follow-up, the height of vertebral body (anterior edge and posterior edge), the Cobb angle of injured segment, the shape of nail-rod system and the degree of pain in the injured site were measured on the same X-ray machine (using VAS score method). The indexes of pre-operation, post-operation and follow-up were compared between the two groups, and the patients' lumbago and back pain and functional recovery were analyzed at the same time. Including: the height of the anterior and posterior edges of the injured vertebrae and the Cobb angle of the injured vertebrae at 4 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and at the time of removal of the nail rod system (14-16 months after operation) in both groups, and the spinal Cobb angle of the injured vertebrae. The complete condition of the nail-rod system and the pain degree of the two groups were evaluated before operation and 6 months after the operation. Results: the results were as follows: 4 days and 3 months after operation, there was no significant difference in vertebral height (anterior edge and posterior edge) between groups (P0.05). The Cobb angle of injured vertebrae was statistically significant (P0.05), and the anterior height of injured vertebrae was statistically significant from 6 months to 6 months after operation (P0.05). 6 months after operation, there was no significant difference in the degree of injury pain between the two groups (P0.05), but there was a statistically significant difference in the degree of pain between the two groups when the nail-rod system was taken (P0.05). There was no significant difference in the posterior margin height of the injured vertebrae between the two groups. The fracture of the rod was found in two cases of the injured vertebrae group during the follow-up. Conclusion: the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture by transposition can recover the anterior height of vertebral body and correct the deformity of spine, reduce the loss of vertebral height and the failure of nail-rod system, and reduce the chronic pain of injured segment of the patient. The long-term effect is accurate. Compared with the traditional treatment of spindles, it has more advantages.
【学位授予单位】:贵阳中医学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:R687.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 潘海涛,麻松,叶新华;经椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的并发症304例分析[J];中国误诊学杂志;2001年07期
2 彭力平,徐宁达,林松青;胸腰椎骨折体外整复器械的临床研究进展[J];湖南中医药导报;2004年11期
3 李任增,张柳;胸腰椎骨折患者腹胀的治疗体会[J];华北煤炭医学院学报;2005年05期
4 沈虹;;胸腰椎骨折伴截瘫患者的常见心理问题及干预对策[J];内蒙古医学杂志;2008年10期
5 于宏伟;王文波;王玉学;;胸腰椎骨折稳定性评分的研究[J];中国骨与关节损伤杂志;2008年04期
6 王刚;彭浩;黄文华;;胸腰椎骨折分类研究进展[J];解剖学研究;2009年02期
7 李韦华;蔡大阅;黄伟章;;中西医结合治疗胸腰椎骨折25例疗效观察[J];云南中医中药杂志;2011年08期
8 郑鹏;焦建峰;;前路减压植骨内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折89例临床分析[J];中外医学研究;2011年27期
9 张炳灿;王正祥;洪建斌;;90例胸腰椎骨折的临床观察[J];中国医学创新;2011年01期
10 孙强;;微创式椎弓根螺钉内固定术治疗胸腰椎骨折[J];中国中医药现代远程教育;2012年02期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 汤逊;周田华;林月秋;邬江;陆升;阮默;张秀琼;江慕尧;李燕;;中华长城固定系统治疗复杂性胸腰椎骨折[A];2005'中国修复重建外科论坛论文汇编[C];2005年
2 徐跃根;杨亚东;;前路减压内固定术治疗胸腰椎骨折[A];2007年浙江省医学会骨科学学术会议暨浙江省抗癌协会骨软肿瘤学术会议论文汇编[C];2007年
3 袁文;陈华江;王新伟;;胸腰椎骨折外科治疗相关问题探讨[A];第八届全国脊柱脊髓损伤学术会议论文汇编[C];2007年
4 籍剑飞;张玉良;任忠明;金辉;裴斐;周杨;王海东;张银华;;胸腰椎骨折的诊治体会[A];2008年浙江省骨科学学术年会论文汇编[C];2008年
5 姜跃国;严雪港;;微创经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折[A];2013中国工程院科技论坛暨浙江省骨科学学术年会论文摘要集[C];2013年
6 许建文;;无神经损伤胸腰椎骨折保守治疗患者迟发临床症状的发生及预防[A];第三届泛中医论坛·思考中医2007——中医“治未病”暨首届扶阳论坛论文集[C];2007年
7 游开发;赖洪喜;邹丰林;邓添发;李玉华;温添华;黄崇清;;骨科床(三折床)膝垫整复胸腰椎骨折[A];第三届中西医结合脊柱及相关疾病学术年会论文集[C];2009年
8 陈国富;陈海啸;洪正华;林列;王章富;张传毅;;创伤性多节段胸腰椎骨折的损伤机制与治疗[A];2009年浙江省骨科学学术年会论文汇编[C];2009年
9 徐跃根;杨亚东;;前路减压内固定术治疗胸腰椎骨折[A];2009年浙江省骨科学学术年会论文汇编[C];2009年
10 张俊仁;张世峰;景健;;胸腰椎骨折35例的影像学分析[A];《中华急诊医学杂志》第九届组稿会暨第二届急诊医学青年论坛全国急危重症与救援医学学习班论文汇编[C];2010年
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 广东省东莞康华医院脊柱关节科 罗德民;老人易发胸腰椎骨折 手术细看椎体形态[N];健康报;2010年
2 张维;胸腰椎骨折有何表现[N];农村医药报(汉);2009年
3 记者 陈吉春;用心灵感动病人[N];中山日报;2006年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 杨守铭;胸腰椎骨折的研究[D];第一军医大学;2001年
2 李浩;老年胸腰椎骨折的有限元分析及其临床应用[D];上海交通大学;2014年
3 肖侃侃;三种术式治疗胸腰椎骨折临床疗效的meta分析[D];广西医科大学;2015年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 袁浩;开放经椎管植骨内固定术与微创经椎弓根植骨内固定术治疗胸腰椎骨折的近期疗效比较[D];遵义医学院;2015年
2 邓光茂;经单侧椎管植骨治疗胸腰椎骨折去除内固定后回顾性分析[D];遵义医学院;2015年
3 沈毅弘;接骨丹片在胸腰椎骨折伤椎置钉治疗术后的临床研究[D];福建中医药大学;2015年
4 耿涛;胸腰椎骨折的研究进展[D];河北医科大学;2015年
5 屈鹏;经伤椎椎弓根螺钉固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效分析[D];兰州大学;2015年
6 陈航;早期活动对胸腰椎骨折术后患者影像学疗效的影响[D];广西医科大学;2015年
7 宁宇;经皮与开放椎弓根螺钉系统均配合中医疗法治疗胸腰椎骨折比较研究[D];湖北中医药大学;2015年
8 柯镇文;经皮与开放椎弓根螺钉内固定术治疗胸腰椎骨折围手术期炎性状态变化的临床观察[D];湖北中医药大学;2015年
9 孟斌;胸腰椎骨折应用GSS结合经椎弓根植骨治疗的临床研究[D];青岛大学;2015年
10 周燕梅;集束化护理在胸腰椎骨折术后患者腹胀便秘中的临床应用[D];南华大学;2014年
,本文编号:2464294
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/2464294.html