当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 心血管论文 >

OCT和冠脉造影在冠心病介入诊疗过程中对心电图的影响

发布时间:2018-04-20 03:13

  本文选题:冠心病 + CAG ; 参考:《河北医科大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:目的:在冠心病介入诊疗过程中,通过对体表心电图各波形的动态监测,对比分析OCT与冠脉造影这两种成像技术对心电图变化的影响。方法:选取2015-09至2017-01就诊于我院的冠状动脉硬化患者共134例,随机分为两组,一组为CAG组(n=98),即在CAG成像技术指导下进行介入诊疗,另一组为OCT组(n=36),即在CAG成像技术指导下进行介入诊疗并行OCT检查。在介入诊疗过程中,通过对体表心电图的动态监测,以QRS波群(R波振幅和QRS间期)、ST-T的改变为监测指标进行统计学分析,将各组间的数据采用SPSS17.0统计软件进行差异性分析,以P0.05为差异有统计学意义,对比分析OCT和CAG在CHD介入诊疗过程中对心电图的影响。结果:1基础资料对比:分别对两组患者入院资料进行统计,包括性别、年龄、体重、高血压、糖尿病、高脂血症,结果P值均0.05,无统计学差异。2 CAG组在注射造影剂后,出现R波振幅降低或升高的32例,QRS间期增宽的25例,ST段压低或降低、抬高或升高的共72例,T波振幅降低或倒置加深的68例,此外,有18例发生缓慢性心律失常,表现为窦性心动过缓,5例发生快速性心律失常,表现为室性心动过速。OCT组在注射造影剂后,出现R波振幅降低或升高的11例,QRS间期增宽的9例,ST段压低或降低、抬高或升高的共26例,T波振幅降低或倒置加深的24例,有3例发生缓慢性心律失常,表现为窦性心动过缓,1例发生快速性心律失常,表现为室性心动过速。组间对比ECG的变化率:(1)R波振幅变化率,CAG组和OCT组32.7%vs30.6%,P=0.818,无统计学差异;(2)QRS间期变化率,CAG组和OCT组25.5%vs25%,P=0.952,无统计学差异;(3)ST段变化率,CAG组和OCT组73.5%vs72.2%,P=0.885,无统计学差异;(4)T波振幅变化率,CAG组和OCT组69.4%vs66.7%,P=0.763,无统计学差异;(5)心率减慢,CAG组和OCT组18.4%vs8.3%,P=0.157,无统计学差异;(6)室速,CAG组和OCT组5.1%vs2.8%,P=0.564,无统计学差异。结论:在CHD介入诊疗过程中,尽管OCT检查需要注入更多的造影剂并且推注速度更快,但是OCT和CAG一样会出现QRS波群变化、ST段压低(或降低)或者抬高(或升高)、T波振幅降低或倒置加深、缓慢性或快速性心律失常,它们的变化率无显著差异,所以,OCT检查与CAG对心电图的影响无差异。
[Abstract]:Objective: in the process of interventional diagnosis and treatment of coronary heart disease, through dynamic monitoring of the various waveforms of the body surface electrocardiogram, the effects of the two imaging techniques of OCT and coronary angiography on the changes of electrocardiogram were compared and analyzed. Methods: 134 cases of coronary arteriosclerosis in our hospital were selected from 2015-09 to 2017-01, and were randomly divided into two groups, one group of CAG (n=98), or C Under the guidance of AG imaging technology, the other group is OCT group (n=36), that is, intervention diagnosis and treatment of OCT under the guidance of CAG imaging technology. In the process of interventional diagnosis and treatment, the dynamic monitoring of the body surface electrocardiogram, QRS wave group (R wave amplitude and QRS interval), ST-T change as the monitoring index, the statistical analysis is carried out between each group. The data were analyzed with SPSS17.0 statistical software, and the difference between P0.05 and OCT was statistically significant. The effects of OCT and CAG on the electrocardiogram were compared and analyzed. Results: 1 basic data were compared: the data of admission to two groups of patients were statistically analyzed, including sex, age, weight, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and results. The value of P was 0.05. There was no statistical difference in 32 cases of R wave amplitude reduction or elevation after injection of contrast agent in group.2 CAG, 25 cases of QRS interval widening, 72 cases of lower or lower ST segment, elevation or elevation, 68 cases of T wave amplitude decreasing or inversion deepening, and 18 cases with slow chronic arrhythmia, manifested as sinus bradycardia, 5 cases developed fast. Tachyarrhythmia, 11 cases of R wave amplitude decrease or increase after injection of contrast agent in.OCT group, 9 cases of QRS interval widening, 26 cases of ST segment depression or depression, 26 cases of elevation or elevation, 24 cases of T wave amplitude decreasing or inversion deepening, 3 cases with slow arrhythmia, sinus bradycardia, 1 case Rapid arrhythmia, showing ventricular tachycardia. The rate of change of ECG between groups: (1) R wave amplitude change rate, CAG group and OCT group 32.7%vs30.6%, P=0.818, no statistical difference; (2) QRS interval change rate, CAG group and OCT group 25.5%vs25%, P=0.952, no statistical difference; (3) ST segment change rate, no statistics, statistics, statistics, no statistics (4) T wave amplitude change rate, CAG group and OCT group 69.4%vs66.7%, P=0.763, no statistical difference; (5) heart rate slowed, CAG group and OCT group 18.4%vs8.3%, P=0.157, no statistical difference; (6) ventricular tachycardia, CAG group and OCT group 5.1%vs2.8%, no statistical difference. And the speed of pushing is faster, but OCT and CAG will appear QRS wave group changes, ST segment depression (or decrease) or elevation (or elevation), T wave amplitude decrease or inversion deepen, slow or rapid arrhythmia, their change rate has no significant difference, so OCT examination and CAG have no difference on electrocardiogram.

【学位授予单位】:河北医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R541.4

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 崔飞飞;徐惠;;阿托伐他汀对冠心病性心力衰竭患者血浆hs-CRP、NT-proBNP水平及心功能的影响[J];山东医药;2014年08期

2 李艳芳;;2013年欧洲心脏病学会稳定性冠心病及心血管病伴糖尿病指南解读[J];中华老年心脑血管病杂志;2014年02期

3 罗明华;关怀敏;解金红;陈玉善;王贺;邱承杰;董文杰;宗永华;沈晓君;;光学干涉断层成像指导下经皮冠状动脉介入术的临床效果[J];临床心血管病杂志;2013年05期

4 王前程;;OCT、IVUS、冠脉造影对评价斑块及是否行支架手术治疗的优势分析[J];中外医疗;2013年13期

5 闵敏;程开诚;张新霞;胡雪松;;冠心脏病室壁运动异常的超声心动图临床研究[J];实用心脑肺血管病杂志;2011年10期

6 梁允兰;史海波;;冠心病三支病变心电图特点与冠脉造影对比研究[J];中西医结合心脑血管病杂志;2011年07期

7 韩志刚;孟令波;侯静波;于波;;光学相干断层成像与血管内超声对比检测冠状动脉斑块破裂和血栓形成[J];中国介入心脏病学杂志;2010年02期

8 范爱珠;谢建国;;冠状动脉造影中瞬时心电图改变的临床意义[J];山西医药杂志(下半月刊);2007年03期

9 叶新和,骆秉铨,胡大一,魏顺光,柴湘枢;胺碘酮对豚鼠缺血缺氧心肌细胞电生理影响的研究[J];中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志;2000年03期

10 陆廷菡,王树春,刘治刚;选择性冠脉造影过程中的心电图变化及其原因分析[J];山东医药;1990年12期



本文编号:1775985

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/xxg/1775985.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户41b66***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com