PRO量表及SF-36量表测定高血压患者生活质量效果评价
发布时间：2019-04-11 09:13
【摘要】：目的比较健康状况调查(SF-36)量表与中医高血压量表(PRO)测定高血压患者生活质量的效果。方法选择120例住院患者作为调查对象,排除34例,纳入86例。调查员为经过量表培训及考核合格的医生,简要说明后,分别让患者填写SF-36和PRO量表。入院时填写一次并录入测定,2~3 d再次填写并录入测定。统计并分析其信度、效度及反应度,对比两个量表的生活质量效果。结果通过统计对比2个量表的信度、效度及反应度,PRO量表小方面的α系数都0.6,而且多数0.7;两次测定的领域、方面和总分的相关系数均比较高,可以认为两个量表均具有较好的信度。在领域层面上,发现PRO量表和SF-36量表在治疗前后生活质量的变化方面均出现明显变化,而PRO量表变化率比SF-36大。两个量表均能够测定患者生活质量的变化,具有良好的反应度,对比SF-36,PRO量表在高血压患者的评价中更敏感。结论 SF-36与PRO量表均能用于高血压患者生活质量测定,但PRO量表更有针对性和敏感性。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the quality of life (QOL) of hypertension patients measured by SF-36 (Health status Survey) and (PRO) (traditional Chinese Medicine Hypertension scale). Methods 120 inpatients were selected as subjects, 34 cases were excluded and 86 cases were included. After brief explanation, the patients were asked to fill in the SF-36 and pro scales respectively. Fill in and enter the test once on admission, 2 days and 3 days again fill in and enter the measurement. The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the two scales were analyzed, and the quality of life of the two scales were compared. Results the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the two scales were statistically compared. The 伪 coefficients of the small aspect of the PRO scale were 0.6, and most of them were 0.7; The correlation coefficients between aspect and total score of the two tests are higher, and the reliability of the two scales can be considered to be good. At the domain level, it was found that both PRO and SF- 36 showed significant changes in the quality of life before and after treatment, while the change rate of PRO was higher than that of SF-36. Both scales can measure the changes of patients' quality of life and have a good degree of response. The SF-36,PRO scale is more sensitive to the evaluation of hypertension patients. Conclusion both SF-36 and PRO can be used to measure the quality of life of patients with hypertension, but PRO is more specific and sensitive.
【作者单位】： 广州中医药大学;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金资助项目(编号:81173438)
【分类号】：R544.1
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the quality of life (QOL) of hypertension patients measured by SF-36 (Health status Survey) and (PRO) (traditional Chinese Medicine Hypertension scale). Methods 120 inpatients were selected as subjects, 34 cases were excluded and 86 cases were included. After brief explanation, the patients were asked to fill in the SF-36 and pro scales respectively. Fill in and enter the test once on admission, 2 days and 3 days again fill in and enter the measurement. The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the two scales were analyzed, and the quality of life of the two scales were compared. Results the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the two scales were statistically compared. The 伪 coefficients of the small aspect of the PRO scale were 0.6, and most of them were 0.7; The correlation coefficients between aspect and total score of the two tests are higher, and the reliability of the two scales can be considered to be good. At the domain level, it was found that both PRO and SF- 36 showed significant changes in the quality of life before and after treatment, while the change rate of PRO was higher than that of SF-36. Both scales can measure the changes of patients' quality of life and have a good degree of response. The SF-36,PRO scale is more sensitive to the evaluation of hypertension patients. Conclusion both SF-36 and PRO can be used to measure the quality of life of patients with hypertension, but PRO is more specific and sensitive.
【作者单位】： 广州中医药大学;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金资助项目(编号:81173438)
【分类号】：R544.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 刘增杰;徐厚谦;吴红彦;;SF-36量表在动脉粥样硬化患者中的临床应用[J];心血管病学进展;2012年01期
2 龚开政,张振刚,王顺娣,骆秋平,孙晓宁,李爱华,仲玉琴,凤以良;中文版SF-36量表在心力衰竭患者生存质量评价中的应用研究[J];中华物理医学与康复杂志;2004年12期
3 屠晓鸣;俎德玲;金奇志;程科云;蒋一鸣;;SF-36量表评价心脏起搏器植入后生活质量的改善[J];中华物理医学与康复杂志;2007年05期
4 潘雁;叶颖;朱s，
本文编号：2456285
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/xxg/2456285.html
最近更新
教材专著
