传统综合训练与智能化多维视觉训练对屈光不正性弱视的疗效对比及其影响因素研究

发布时间：2018-03-27 07:16

本文选题：屈光不正　切入点：弱视　出处：《眼科新进展》2014年11期

【摘要】：目的研究传统综合训练与智能化多维视觉训练治疗屈光不正性儿童弱视的疗效差异以及相关影响因素。方法选取2010年7月至2012年9月在我院眼科治疗的弱视儿童患者200例,根据治疗方法的不同分为观察组(智能化多维视觉训练组,100例)和对照组(传统综合训练治疗组,100例),分别给予智能化多维视觉训练和传统综合训练治疗,比较两组患儿的疗效及相关影响因素。结果观察组治愈70例,进步27例,无效3例;对照组治愈35例,进步45例,无效20例;观察组患儿的疗效显著优于对照组,差异有显著统计学意义(χ2=28.73,P0.01)。在远视患儿中,观察组的疗效显著优于对照组,差异有显著统计学意义(χ2=11.43,P0.01),而2组近视和散光患儿疗效差异均无统计学意义(χ2=0.159、0.583,均为P0.05)。在3-6岁(χ2=10.30,P0.01)、6-9岁(χ2=6.665,P=0.036)两个年龄段,观察组患儿的疗效优于对照组,而2组9-15岁患儿疗效差异并无统计学意义(χ2=1.895,P0.05)。在不同治疗时间内,观察组患儿治愈率显著高于对照组,差异有显著统计学意义(χ2=20.14,P0.01)。结论智能化多维训练相对于传统综合疗法,治疗屈光不正性弱视患儿疗效更佳,且患儿屈光不正类型、发病年龄及治疗时间明显影响疗效。
[Abstract]:Objective to study the difference between traditional comprehensive training and intelligent multi-dimensional visual training in the treatment of amblyopia in children with ametropia. Methods 200 cases of amblyopia children treated in our hospital from July 2010 to September 2012 were selected. According to the different treatment methods, they were divided into observation group (intelligent multi-dimensional visual training group, 100 cases) and control group (traditional comprehensive training group, 100 cases), which were treated with intelligent multi-dimensional visual training and traditional comprehensive training, respectively. Results 70 cases were cured, 27 cases were improved, 3 cases were ineffective in the observation group, 35 cases were cured, 45 cases were improved and 20 cases were ineffective in the control group, the curative effect of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group. The difference was statistically significant (蠂 2, 28.73, P 0.01). In hyperopia, the curative effect of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group. The difference was statistically significant (蠂 2 / 11.43 / P 0.01), but there was no significant difference between the two groups in myopia and astigmatism (蠂 ~ 2 / 0.159 / 0.583, all P 0.05). In the age of 3-6 years (蠂 ~ (2 +) 10.30 ~ (10. 30)) P 0.01 ~ (-1) (蠂 ~ (26.665) P 0.036), the curative effect of the observation group was better than that of the control group. However, there was no significant difference in the curative effect between the two groups (蠂 ~ 2 ~ (2) 1.895U / P _ (0.05)). The cure rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (蠂 ~ (2 +) 20. 14) P 0.01. Conclusion the curative rate of the observation group is significantly higher than that of the control group (蠂 ~ (2 +) 20.14) P 0.01. Conclusion Intelligent multi-dimensional training is more effective than the traditional comprehensive therapy. The treatment of ametropia amblyopia is more effective, and the type of ametropia, the age of onset and the time of treatment have obvious influence on the curative effect.
【作者单位】：湖北江汉油田总医院眼科;
【分类号】：R777.44

【共引文献】