LASIK术中不同制瓣方式视觉质量的临床研究
[Abstract]:Background and purpose
Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is currently the mainstream surgery for refractive errors. The procedure involves making a pedicled corneal flap on the cornea with a specially designed mini-corneal lamellar knife. After removing the flap, excimer laser ablation is performed on the exposed corneal stroma bed to correct myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism. Keeping the integrity of corneal epithelium and anterior elastic layer, the curative effect is remarkable and the visual acuity recovers quickly after operation. The disadvantage of this operation is that the corneal flap is made on the corneal surface first. The complications caused by the corneal flap made with mini-corneal lamellar knife can not be ignored during the operation. The serious complications affect the visual quality after operation, so the success of the corneal flap. Femtosecond laser is a kind of laser which operates in pulse form and lasts only a few femtoseconds. Femtosecond laser is the shortest pulse that can be obtained under laboratory conditions. At present, the wavelength used in corneal surgery is 1053 nm. In recent years, it has been gradually applied to ophthalmic field, especially in excimer laser surgery, because of its high safety. To study the effect of two different methods of making corneal flap, micro lamellar knife flap and femtosecond laser flap, on visual quality, and to choose the method of making corneal flap clinically The formula has applied value.
To evaluate the visual quality and quality of corneal flap after femtosecond laser flap-making, the effects of two different methods of flap-making were compared.
Method
One hundred patients (200 eyes) with myopia undergoing LASIK were randomly divided into two groups: femtosecond group, lamellar knife group, femtosecond group, corneal flap made by Femto LDV femtosecond laser (Ziemer, Switzerland) and Hansatome lamellar knife group. In addition to the different ways of making corneal flap, the same excimer laser, Technolas 217Z100, was used for wavefront aberration-guided excimer laser ablation in both groups. The thickness of the actual corneal flap was measured by Fourier domain optical coherence tomography in the anterior segment of the cornea one month after the operation, and the degree of uniformity was measured 1 month after the operation. Zhou, January, March reviewed visual acuity, wavefront aberration, and contrast sensitivity.
SPSS16.0 statistical analysis software was used to analyze the experimental data reasonably.
Result
1 Corneal flap measurement: In femtosecond laser group, the actual average thickness of 110 micron corneal flap was 103.54 (-5.60) (88-131) micron, and there was no significant difference between the actual thickness and the expected thickness (P 0.05); the average corneal flap thickness was 102.17 (-4.80) micron in the right eye, 104.42 (-4.97) micron in the left eye and 104.42 (-4.97) micron in the left eye. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P 0.05). In the lamellar knife group, the actual average thickness of 110 micron corneal flap was estimated to be 130.30 + 14.03 (90-158) micron, and the difference between the actual thickness and the expected thickness was statistically significant (P 0.05); the average thickness of the right eye (right eye) was 127.17 + 16.60 micron, and the left eye (left eye) was 109.42 + 16 micron. The difference between.8 and m was statistically significant (P0.05).
2 aberration changes: the total high-order aberration before and after operation in femtosecond laser group, the third-order vertical coma did not change, and there was no significant difference compared with preoperative (P 0.05); different time after operation, the total high-order aberration in the lamellar knife group, the third-order vertical coma increased more than the femtosecond group, the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05); the postoperative spherical aberration, the third-order horizontal coma were all more significant than the femtosecond group. Before operation, the lamellar knife group increased more than the femtosecond group, and the difference was statistically significant (P0.05).
3 Contrast sensitivity changes: In open vision, there was no significant difference in spatial frequency between the two groups at the same time after surgery (P 0.05); in dark vision, femtosecond group was superior to the lamellar knife group at 12.0c/pd and 18.0c/pd one week after surgery, and the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). Significance of learning (P 0.05); In glare state, there was no significant difference in spatial frequency between the two groups at the same time period (P 0.05); In glare state, the spatial frequency of femtosecond group was better than that of laminar knife group at 1 week after surgery, and the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). There was no significant difference in spatial frequency between the two groups at 1 month and 3 months after surgery. Meaning (P0.05).
conclusion
1 femtosecond laser has good predictive accuracy and good repeatability.
2. The high order aberration introduced by femtosecond laser is small.
3 the femtosecond laser flap was better than the lamellar knife group in postoperative contrast sensitivity, and the visual quality was good after operation.
【学位授予单位】:郑州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:R779.63
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 许海敏;钱欣;;LASIK术后佩戴软性角膜接触镜的观察及护理[J];全科护理;2011年21期
2 杨默迟;马雅玲;庄文娟;梅惠香;;OrbscanⅡ动态监测近视LASIK术后角膜后表面前凸变化的研究[J];宁夏医学杂志;2011年06期
3 陆升红;梁雁芳;;如何把健康教育贯穿在LASIK手术中[J];医学信息(中旬刊);2011年07期
4 植玉婷;孙涛;黄勇志;;LASIK术后14个月角膜瓣丢失1例[J];临床眼科杂志;2011年04期
5 雷玉琳;郑秀云;侯杰;孟小丽;党光福;;飞秒激光制瓣发生前房气泡的处理探讨[J];临床眼科杂志;2011年03期
6 马学仁;赵莉;李新章;宋吉珍;;近视LASIK术前氩激光预防性视网膜光凝的观察[J];青海医药杂志;2011年05期
7 鲁齐;许寅聪;李纲;李正时;何顺华;;飞秒激光与机械板层刀制瓣的SBK手术效果比较[J];实用医院临床杂志;2011年04期
8 乔芳;刘畅;傅培;刘颜;贺美;乔诗凝;杨潇;;近视眼准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后角膜厚度与眼压关系的相关分析[J];临床眼科杂志;2011年03期
9 冯宇宁;方学军;苏云;莫俊柏;史天禹;;泪道塞在LASIK术后的早期应用[J];国际眼科杂志;2011年09期
10 田廷原;赵小虎;马海鹰;;2438眼飞秒激光制作角膜瓣并发症的临床观察[J];川北医学院学报;2011年03期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 刘美娜;;飞秒激光制瓣LASIK手术的术前宣教[A];全国五官科护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2010年
2 崔艳琨;张沧霞;;准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术中角膜瓣技术的进展[A];第十届全国中西医结合眼科学术会议暨第五届海峡眼科学术交流会论文汇编[C];2011年
3 徐勤;肖燕;;LASIK手术患者遵医行为与术后效果的分析[A];全国五官科护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2010年
4 汤广成;谷寅;;飞秒激光制瓣的LASIK治疗高度近视疗效分析[A];2011年浙江省眼科学术会议论文集[C];2011年
5 林咸平;费安裕;方燕;叶晓玲;崔钢峰;;LASIK术中应用地塞米松瓣下冲洗预防弥漫性板层角膜炎[A];2011年浙江省眼科学术会议论文集[C];2011年
6 易昀敏;许建人;邹芬兰;谢凤英;;Moria M2型90刀头在LASIK中的临床应用[A];江西省第九次中西医结合眼科、中医眼科学术交流会论文汇编[C];2008年
7 金红颖;;One use-plus SBK LASIK治疗屈光不正的手术并发症[A];2011年浙江省眼科学术会议论文集[C];2011年
8 李康(宀隽);俞阿勇;余野;王勤美;杨新军;;近视患者LASIK术后的生活质量评价[A];华东地区第十次流行病学学术会议暨华东地区流行病学学术会议20周年庆典论文汇编[C];2010年
9 ;Conductive Keratoplasty:An Approach for the Correction of Residual Hyperopia in post-LASIK Pseudophakia[A];2011年浙江省眼科学术会议论文集[C];2011年
10 黄卿;董启云;;LASIK术后五年继发圆锥角膜一例[A];第十次全省中、西医眼科学术交流会(暨吉安地区眼科专委会成立会议)学术论文集[C];2010年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 黄石爱康医院(原冶钢医院)眼科主任医学硕士 张鹏举;万级层流手术室:LASIK手术成功的保障[N];黄石日报;2005年
2 本报记者 张云川;节前 LASIK“贴身肉搏”[N];成都日报;2005年
3 博文;Hi-safe LASIK治近视受瞩目[N];深圳商报;2004年
4 骁勇;波前像差检查,,使LASIK更完美[N];中国中医药报;2004年
5 曾自明 ;给自己一双明亮的眼睛吧[N];大众卫生报;2005年
6 记者 殳慧平;全数字化飞秒激光手术在杭州受捧[N];杭州日报;2011年
7 北京大学第一医院眼科 李海丽;屈光矫正手术与LASIK[N];中国高新技术产业导报;2001年
8 复旦大学附属眼耳鼻喉科医院眼科副教授 周行涛;防治近视选择合适方法[N];解放日报;2004年
9 刘奇民 梁言;准分子激光技术:几分欢喜几分忧[N];人民政协报;2004年
10 张春发;超薄瓣LASIK增加更多安全保障[N];消费日报;2008年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 张立军;前弹力层下准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视的实验及临床研究[D];第二军医大学;2010年
2 买志彬;FEMTO LDV飞秒激光辅助LASIK术后角膜形态和视觉质量的研究[D];郑州大学;2010年
3 李招娜;角膜上皮瓣弃留对Epi-LASIK矫治近视影响的实验与临床研究[D];山东大学;2012年
4 汪亮;近视眼LASIK术后晶状体厚度改变及其对屈光回退的影响[D];南方医科大学;2012年
5 邹俊;超薄角膜瓣LASIK手术的实验与临床研究[D];复旦大学;2005年
6 徐海琳;高度近视LASEK/Epi-LASIK远期安全性、有效性及角膜后表面高度研究[D];复旦大学;2012年
7 于华军;近视眼LASIK术后人工晶状体屈光度测算中应用矫正角膜曲率的效能检验[D];山东大学;2012年
8 周少博;近视眼LASIK术后调节变化及手术前后调节致眼前节结构变化的比较[D];南方医科大学;2012年
9 董子献;飞秒激光角膜基质透镜切除(ReLEx)创伤愈合及机制研究[D];复旦大学;2012年
10 郭秀瑾;不同方式的准分子激光表面切削术后角膜创伤愈合反应的实验研究[D];河北医科大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 杨成香;光动力学角膜胶原交联对LASIK术后角膜瓣愈合影响的实验研究[D];天津医科大学;2012年
2 杨璐;LASIK术中角膜瓣制作与激光切削非同步时双眼波阵面像差的分析[D];大连医科大学;2004年
3 车红芳;LASIK术中不同制瓣方式视觉质量的临床研究[D];郑州大学;2011年
4 陈璇;应用OCT对LASIK术患者角膜情况的早期临床观察[D];中南大学;2012年
5 杨前;准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术角膜瓣蒂不同位置的神经损伤及再生的形态学研究[D];大连医科大学;2004年
6 王洋;游离角膜瓣对LASIK术后角膜散光影响的实验研究[D];中国医科大学;2002年
7 宋冰冰;LASIK术中角膜板层刀片的使用次数对角膜瓣质量的影响的实验研究[D];中国医科大学;2009年
8 张杰;前弹力层下激光角膜磨镶术与传统LASIK治疗近视的临床对比研究[D];浙江大学;2011年
9 陈艳路;LASIK治疗近视远期疗效的观察分析[D];大连医科大学;2011年
10 赵秀秀;不同制瓣方法LASIK术后眼表与细胞因子相关性研究[D];天津医科大学;2012年
本文编号:2223445
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/yank/2223445.html