用不同测量方法得到的效用值的比较
发布时间:2018-10-16 16:26
【摘要】:目的:比较用不同测量方法得到的效用值之间的差异。方法:采用不同测量方法同时对350例老年性黄斑变性的患者进行效用测量,把用不同测量方法得到的效用值的中位数作为相对标准效用值与各种效用值进行比较、方差分析、相关分析和曲线拟合。结果:用不同测量方法得到的效用值之间的差异和相关性大多具有显著意义,相对标准效用值与各种效用值的曲线方程也具有显著意义,但拟合度都不高。结论:对于相同的对象用不同测量方法得到的效用值是不同的,在没有绝对标准的情况下,本研究得到的结果可以作为用单一方法测量得到的效用值的修正参考。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare the differences between the utility values obtained by different measurement methods. Methods: the utility of 350 patients with age-related macular degeneration was measured simultaneously by different measurement methods. The median of utility value obtained by different methods was compared with various utility values, and the variance analysis was performed. Correlation analysis and curve fitting. Results: the difference and correlation between the utility values obtained by different measurement methods were significant. The curve equations of relative standard utility values and various utility values were also significant, but the fitting degree was not high. Conclusion: the utility values obtained by different measurement methods are different for the same objects. In the absence of absolute standards, the results obtained in this study can be used as a reference for the correction of utility values obtained by a single method.
【作者单位】: 上海应用技术学院人文学院劳动与社会保障教研室;复旦大学公共卫生学院卫生经济教研室;
【分类号】:R774.5
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare the differences between the utility values obtained by different measurement methods. Methods: the utility of 350 patients with age-related macular degeneration was measured simultaneously by different measurement methods. The median of utility value obtained by different methods was compared with various utility values, and the variance analysis was performed. Correlation analysis and curve fitting. Results: the difference and correlation between the utility values obtained by different measurement methods were significant. The curve equations of relative standard utility values and various utility values were also significant, but the fitting degree was not high. Conclusion: the utility values obtained by different measurement methods are different for the same objects. In the absence of absolute standards, the results obtained in this study can be used as a reference for the correction of utility values obtained by a single method.
【作者单位】: 上海应用技术学院人文学院劳动与社会保障教研室;复旦大学公共卫生学院卫生经济教研室;
【分类号】:R774.5
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 李明晖;罗南;;欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)中文版应用介绍[J];中国药物经济学;2009年01期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 武轶群;刘括;唐迅;曹洋;王晋伟;李娜;刘建江;于立平;许海涛;刘武军;温苏申;胡永华;李凯;;采用欧洲五维健康量表测量北京郊区老年人健康效用的实证研究[J];北京大学学报(医学版);2012年03期
2 尚朝军;付泽伟;;甘露聚糖肽胶囊在慢性阻塞性肺疾病稳定期的临床效果研究[J];中国医药导刊;2013年02期
3 顾杰;陈慧勇;何东仪;朱琦;王臻;沈杰;祝X≈,
本文编号:2274971
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/yank/2274971.html
最近更新
教材专著