2011年版美国用药安全自评量表汉化及应用初测

发布时间：2018-02-09 06:24

本文关键词： 用药安全自评量表信度效度　出处：《中国医院药学杂志》2017年21期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的:汉化2011年版美国药物安全自评量表并检验其信度、效度,通过对某医院内科药物安全进行初步评估,探索该量表中文版在我国临床的适用性。方法:获取原作者授权,应用Brislin的跨文化研究翻译理论与方法学形成中文版量表,并检验其信、效度。采用便利抽样选取某医院内科系统,依据ISMP推荐方法成立评估小组对各项指标进行测评。结果:汉化后的量表包括10个维度,20个核心特征及270个条目,Cronbach’sα系数为0.996,重测信度为0.95,内容效度指数(CVI)为0.95。医院内科用药安全自我测评结果显示,患者信息(mean%=61%)、药物信息(mean%=67%)、质量流程和风险管理(mean%=74%)得分较低,提示医院需采取措施给予改进。结论:中文版量表具有较好的信度和效度,在改进我国医院患者用药安全上具有重要作用。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the clinical applicability of the Chinese version of the American Drug Safety Self-Rating scale (DSAS) in China on 2011, and to test its reliability and validity. Methods: to obtain the authorisation of the original author, the Chinese version of the scale was used to evaluate the drug safety in a hospital. Using Brislin's cross-cultural translation theory and methodology to form the Chinese version of the scale, and to test its reliability and validity. Results: the Chinese scale included 10 dimensions, 20 core features and 270 items. The coefficient of Cronbachs 伪 was 0.996, the test-retest reliability was 0.95, and the content validity index was 0.95.Results: the Chinese scale included 10 dimensions, 20 core features and 270 items, the Cronbachs 伪 coefficient was 0.996, and the content validity index was 0.95. The results of self-evaluation on the safety of drug use in internal medicine of our hospital show that. The patients' information is worth 61g, the drug information is 67.75, the quality flow and risk management are lower, suggesting that the hospital should take measures to improve it. Conclusion: the Chinese version of the scale has better reliability and validity. It plays an important role in improving the drug safety of hospital patients in our country.
【作者单位】：北京协和医学院护理学院;北京协和医院药剂科;美国德州大学泰勒分校护理学院;北京大学第一附属医院;北京阜外医院;
【基金】：北京协和医学院2016年协和青年基金(编号:3332016120)
【分类号】：R95

【相似文献】