药品缺陷侵权责任研究
发布时间:2018-04-21 03:39
本文选题:药品缺陷 + 缺陷标准 ; 参考:《南京中医药大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:药品安全关系到人们的健康和生命安全,但是药品并不具有绝对的安全性,俗话说“是药三分毒”,近些年来因为药品的不安全性给人们带来的损害越来越多,其中因药品缺陷给人们带来的损害也屡见不鲜,对于该类事件的处理还存在诸多困惑,本文将以此为背景对药品缺陷侵权责任进行研究。基于我国现行的法律法规和司法实践,对比国内外的立法和判例,笔者将模块化分析药品缺陷侵权责任。 笔者将药品侵权责任分为概述、构成要件、归责原则、责任承担四大模块进行研究。第一块,概述中运用文献研究法,结合法律规定,对药品侵权责任的相关概念作了简要叙述,并且对文章研究内容的内涵进行了界定;第二块,构成要件中,运用文献研究法,结合我国法律规定,参照国外立法,按照药品缺陷的类型,分类讨论了不同类型的药品缺陷的判断标准,并且着重探讨了药品侵权责任中因果关系证明方法;第三块,采用国内外对比研究的方法,将美国、德国与我国药品侵权归责原则进行比较研究,针对我国统一归责原则的不足,参照美国立法,提出按缺陷类型分别适用不同归责原则的设计;第四块,主要运用文献研究、个案分析等研究方法,结合法律理论和司法实务,着重探讨我国药品侵权责任主体、责任分担、免责等方面存在的问题。 笔者通过对药品侵权责任进行模块化研究,发现了我国现行法律适用和司法实践中存在的各种问题,表明现行的产品责任法律法规已经不能满足药品责任的法律适用需求。为了克服这些问题,笔者在文章最后提出通过出台《侵权责任法司法解释》的完善立法方式,解决当下药品责任领域面临的问题,并且给出了一些具有针对性的建议。
[Abstract]:Drug safety is related to people's health and life safety, but drugs do not have absolute safety. As the saying goes, "drug triple-poison" has caused more and more damage to people in recent years because of the unsafety of drugs. The damage caused by drug defects to people is also common. There are still many puzzles about the handling of this kind of incidents. This paper will study the tort liability of drug defects against this background. Based on the current laws and regulations and judicial practice, the author will analyze the tort liability of drug defects by modularization. The author divides drug tort liability into four modules: summary, constitutive elements, imputation principle and responsibility bearing. In the first part, the author makes a brief description of the related concepts of drug tort liability, and defines the connotation of the research content in the summary. In the second part, the author uses the literature research method in the constitutive elements. Combined with the laws and regulations of our country, referring to the foreign legislation, according to the types of drug defects, this paper discusses the judgment criteria of different types of drug defects, and emphatically discusses the causality proof method in drug tort liability. By using the method of comparative study at home and abroad, this paper makes a comparative study on the principle of imputation of drug infringement in the United States, Germany and China. The author puts forward the design of applying different imputation principles according to the types of defects. The fourth part mainly uses the methods of literature study and case analysis, combining with the legal theory and judicial practice, to discuss the main body of the drug tort liability and the sharing of the responsibility in our country. The problems existing in such aspects as exemption from liability. Through the modularization study of drug tort liability, the author finds out all kinds of problems existing in the current law application and judicial practice in our country, and shows that the current product liability laws and regulations can no longer meet the legal application needs of drug liability. In order to overcome these problems, the author puts forward a perfect legislative method of "Judicial interpretation of Tort liability Law" to solve the problems in the field of drug liability, and gives some specific suggestions.
【学位授予单位】:南京中医药大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:R95
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨益峰;杨立英;;药品不良反应的民事责任和救济机制思考[J];安徽医药;2007年04期
2 陈会平;;疫苗不良反应损害救济及其路径选择[J];保险研究;2011年06期
3 赵西巨;论药品的警示缺陷责任[J];法律与医学杂志;2004年03期
4 廖焕国;;医疗机构连带承担药品缺陷责任之质疑[J];法学评论;2011年04期
5 秦雯;冯璩;陶婷婷;;从曲美事件看我国药品召回制度的完善措施[J];法制与社会;2011年07期
6 宋跃晋;;基于法学视角的药品损害及赔偿责任[J];法制与社会;2012年01期
7 g,
本文编号:1780801
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/yiyaoxuelunwen/1780801.html
最近更新
教材专著