反事实不蕴含下向因果性(英文)
发布时间:2017-12-26 19:26
本文关键词:反事实不蕴含下向因果性(英文) 出处:《自然辩证法通讯》2017年01期 论文类型:期刊论文
【摘要】:自从金在权用随附论证向非还原物理主义提出挑战以来,后者不竭余力地想要解决排斥问题。在他们当中,反事实的自治方案找到了一条出路,即通过消除下向因果来解决排斥问题。然而,钟磊提出,结合随附性原则和反事实的因果理论就会导致下向因果。在本文中,我将通过对随附和反事实因果的概念分析说明,根据大卫·刘易斯的因果定义,如果钟磊想要证明他的结论,他需要更多的步骤。接着,我将证明这种新版本的论证无法实现钟磊的目标,因而,不能被视作有效的。
[Abstract]:Since gold challenged the non reductive physics with the argument, the latter tried to solve the problem of exclusion. Among them, the anti factual autonomy scheme found a way out, that is, to solve the problem of exclusion by eliminating the underlying cause and effect. However, Zhong Lei proposed that the combination of the principle of attachment and the causal theory of anti fact lead to cause and effect. In this article, I will explain by the analysis of the concept of attachment and counterfactual causality. According to David Lewis's causal definition, if Zhong Lei wants to prove his conclusion, he needs more steps. Next, I will prove that this new version of the argument does not achieve the goal of Zhong Lei, so it can not be regarded as effective.
【作者单位】: 北京大学哲学系;
【分类号】:B025.5
【正文快照】: 1.Background There are numerous philosophers,called nonreductive physicalists(NRP),who agree with basic principles of Physicalism but insist that mental property cannot be reduced to physical property.The main goal of NRP is to save the causal power of ,
本文编号:1338544
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/1338544.html