儒家性朴论思想史发微:从先秦到西汉

发布时间：2017-12-27 14:16

  本文关键词：儒家性朴论思想史发微:从先秦到西汉　出处：《文史哲》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

  更多相关文章： 荀子 孟子 孟荀关系 汉唐

【摘要】：人们习惯于以荀子为性恶论的代表,但实际上他是性朴论的代表,性恶论为荀子后学所持。刘向编《荀子》时把《性恶》夹在显然属于非荀子作品的《子道》和《法行》之间,这一历史细节非常重要。孔子所谓"性相近,习相远"亦显示出性朴论的取向。性朴论与性恶论尖锐冲突,无法协调。主张"性者,天质之朴"的董仲舒,是西汉性朴论的最重要代表。在他之前的贾谊和与他同时的韩婴也持性朴论。引入"性朴论"这一概念研究中国人性论史,可以产生很多新的、富有启发性的看法,同时也可澄清历史上的一些误解。
[Abstract]:People are accustomed to Xunzi as the representative of evil, but in fact he is the representative of Portsmouth, evil is held by the Xunzi school. When Liu Xiangbian "Xunzi", "sex evil" is sandwiched between "son" and "law", which is clearly a non Xunzi work. This historical detail is very important. The so-called "Confucius Their natures are much the same., Xi Xiangyuan" also shows that the orientation of the park on the. Pu theory and the theory of evil human nature conflict, cannot coordinate. Dong Zhongshu, who advocates "the nature of the nature," is the most important representative of the simple theory of the Western Han Dynasty. Before him, Jia Yi and Han Ying, who were at the same time, were also unadorned. Introducing the concept of "the theory of simplicity" can bring many new and inspiring views to the study of the history of Chinese human nature. At the same time, it can also clarify some misunderstandings in history.
【作者单位】： 华南师范大学政治与行政学院国学研究中心;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国人性论通史”(15ZDB004)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：B222.6
【正文快照】： 中国人性论史上的性善论、性恶论、性有善有恶论等,人们早已熟知,但“性朴论”确实是一个大家比较陌生的概念。本文拟以它为中心对从先秦到西汉的中国人性论史进行一些新的叙说,以冀弥补以往研究之不足,帮助我们对中国人性论史进行新的认识。一、孔荀均持性朴论虽然性朴的思想，

本文编号：1342033