道统论视域下的宋代抑荀思潮

发布时间：2017-12-28 02:04

本文关键词：道统论视域下的宋代抑荀思潮　出处：《烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：荀子在汉唐时代曾经与孟子并称为"荀孟",但其道统地位在两宋时期受到学者们的怀疑和否定,"抑荀"成为宋代荀学史上的主流思潮。在荀子思想是否与孔子相合的"醇疵之辨"问题上,宋初儒者尚认同韩愈"荀子大醇而小疵"之说,随后兴起的理学家们则认定其"小醇而大疵"。醇疵之辨还是儒学内部的讨论,随着道统体系的完善,学者们对荀子的学派归属也开始产生质疑,荀子人性论被宋儒批评为源自告子杞柳之说,其政治哲学更被朱熹认为是申韩之学。荀子不能进入儒家的道统谱系,还因为他在道德层面不能达到儒家圣贤所应具备的精神境界,在宋儒特别是理学家看来,荀子并不完全具备儒家所努力倡导的圣贤人格。
[Abstract]:Xunzi in the Han and Tang Dynasties and has Mencius and known as the "Xun Meng", but the ruling position of scholars questioned and denied in the two Song Dynasties, "anti Xun" in Song Dynasty in the history of the mainstream of xunzi. At the thought of Xunzi and Confucius are matched "defects on alcohol", the song is "Xun Zida Han Yu Churu identity alcohol is" said, the subsequent rise of the Neo Confucianism is that "the small and large defects of alcohol". Alcohol on or defect of Confucianism within the discussion, with the improvement of Confucian system, scholars of Xunzi school belonging also began to doubt, Xunzi was criticized for the song Confucian theory of human nature from Gaozi was that the political philosophy of Zhu Xi is considered to be studying Han shen. Xunzi can not enter the Confucian orthodoxy lineage, but also because he cannot reach on the moral level of Confucian sages should have the spirit of Confucianism in the song state, especially science experts, Xunzi did not have all the efforts to promote the personality of saint.
【作者单位】：中共上海市委党校马克思主义与当代中国实践哲学研究中心;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“中国传统价值观变迁史”(14ZDB003)
【分类号】：B222.6;B244
【正文快照】： 由韩愈所倡立的儒家道统论,到两宋时期得到了进一步的丰富与发展,成为儒家学者特别是理学家复兴儒学、排斥佛老的重要理论工具。在理学高度发展的两宋时期,道统论不仅被用来排斥佛老,而且也用于对儒家内部的不同学派进行严格甄别。宋儒运用非常严格甚至是苛刻的标准来辨别道统

【相似文献】