哲学研究的跨文化视角

发布时间：2018-01-12 11:36

本文关键词：哲学研究的跨文化视角　出处：《江海学刊》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：哲学是彻底的追问,它的任务就是对一些特定的活动、行为或者一整套信念的基础性假设进行质疑。在这样做的过程中,哲学的追问必须努力勾画出一个问题,并且发展出一种解决这个问题的方法来。然而,为了忠实于自己的意图,哲学必须既能够探究它要追问的客体本身,又要有能力探究哲学自身进行质疑的方法。为了完成这一任务,需要哲学不仅能与其想要质疑的假设保持一定的距离,而且也需要与哲学自身的假设保持一定的距离,也就是说,哲学必须能够对自己的研究方法提出质疑。这种自反性要求任何特定的哲学研究必须从另一种具有优势的立场上进行探究。由于要去质疑的种种假设深深地植根于一种特定的文化之中,因此仅有内在批判是不充分的。跳出这些文化的种种预设的边界线的唯一方法就是要从另一种具有优势的文化哲学传统的立场上来思考特定的问题。因此,我认为,没有跨文化的哲学研究方法,哲学追问是无法超越某些局限的。通过解决"自我"问题的西方哲学研究方法与印度佛教的描述之间的对话,我阐述了跨文化哲学研究是如何应对这一问题的。
[Abstract]:Philosophy is a thorough questioning, and its task is to question the basic assumptions of certain activities, actions, or a set of beliefs. In doing so, philosophical questioning must strive to outline a problem. And to develop a solution to this problem, however, in order to be faithful to his own intentions, philosophy must be able to explore the object itself. In order to accomplish this task, it is necessary for philosophy not only to maintain a certain distance from the hypotheses it wants to question. And also need to keep a certain distance from the assumptions of philosophy itself, that is to say. Philosophy must be able to question its own research methods. This reflexivity requires that any particular philosophical study be explored from another advantageous standpoint. The assumptions to be questioned are deeply rooted. In a particular culture. Therefore, internal criticism is not sufficient. The only way to get out of the presupposition of these cultures is to think about specific problems from the standpoint of another cultural philosophical tradition with advantages. In my opinion, without cross-cultural philosophical research methods, philosophical inquiry cannot go beyond certain limitations. The dialogue between Western philosophical research methods to solve the "self" problem and the description of Indian Buddhism. I have explained how cross-cultural philosophical research deals with this problem.
【作者单位】：美国纽约城市大学约翰·杰刑事司法学院;天津外国语大学欧美文化哲学研究所;
【分类号】：B0
【正文快照】： 在北美,一个获得了哲学专业学士学位的人从未阅读或讨论过非西方哲学家作品的情况并不少见。甚至情形很可能是,某人完成了研究生课程,却没有读过任何一部非西方哲学文本。尽管这种情况已开始有所变化,但普遍的情形是:当从事比较哲学研究的学者们试图在一门本质上属于西方哲学

【相似文献】