“中庸的”无神论——亚里士多德《伦理学》和《政治学》关于神及神事的论述初探
发布时间:2018-03-13 05:22
本文选题:亚里士多德 切入点:哲学 出处:《现代哲学》2017年01期 论文类型:期刊论文
【摘要】:亚里士多德谈论哲学、幸福、智慧、美德,分析运动、灵魂、原因等诸观念时无不涉及“神”这一概念。不过,这个明显不同于奥林珀斯山众神的“神”,在自然哲人那里未曾有明确定义,亚里士多德却以哲学的方式将之确立起来。这个“神”既是哲学的最高原则,也是无形之中否弃传统诸神的利器。因而,亚里士多德的“哲学之神”更接近无神论,或者说更有可能颠覆传统的诸神信仰。然而,透过亚里士多德的《伦理学》和《政治学》中对神与神事的论述,我们却发现亚里士多德在实践层面对传统诸神信仰的维护和建构。本文试图探究亚里士多德在这些作品中如何论及神与神事,并尝试理解其意图。
[Abstract]:Aristotle talked about philosophy, happiness, wisdom, virtue, analysis of movement, soul, reason, etc. This "God", which is obviously different from the gods of the Orimpus Mountains, has not been clearly defined by the natural philosophers, but Aristotle has established it in a philosophical way. This "God" is the supreme principle of philosophy. It is also an invisible weapon against the traditional gods. Thus, Aristotle's "philosophical God" is closer to atheism, or more likely to subvert the traditional belief in the gods. Through Aristotle's "Ethics" and "Politics" on God and God's things, However, we find that Aristotle maintains and constructs the traditional belief of the gods in practice. This paper attempts to explore how Aristotle talks about God and God in these works and tries to understand his intention.
【作者单位】: 重庆大学人文社科高等研究院古典学研究中心;
【分类号】:B502.233
【相似文献】
相关会议论文 前1条
1 孙宏云;;那特xA的《政治学》及其在晚清的译介与影响[A];辛亥革命与清末民初思想[C];2012年
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 复旦大学社会科学基础部 王涛;《政治学》中的微言大义[N];中国社会科学报;2013年
,本文编号:1605005
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/1605005.html