关于中国思想史连续性写法的分析

发布时间：2018-03-16 06:47

本文选题：中国思想史　切入点：治史观　出处：《兰州大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：从思想史的治史方法论入手,指出连续性的思想史写法潜藏着严重的进化论倾向,平滑、连续、发展的思想史写法限制了思想史家的视域,主宰了其观念世界,对于那些不能摆置在连续性之下的思想历史对象,其认为不是历史本身有突兀、断裂,而仅仅是写作者的主观努力不够、材料占有不够,并不会怀疑连续性写法本身的问题。其实,在思想的历史长河中既有连续又有断裂现象,中国思想史也不例外,不能因中国思想文化的精神或历史精神具有连续性、联贯性,就信赖连续性写法,二者有区别。如果思想史的写作者能在连续性的方法中同时关照那些思想史上的非连续现象,试图对特定的思想历史对象本身的结构及其边界进行分析,在一定程度上会避免连续性写法的局限性,使思想史的研究打开更广阔的思想空间。
[Abstract]:Starting with the methodology of the history of thought, it is pointed out that the continuous writing of the history of thought has hidden a serious tendency of evolution, which is smooth, continuous and developing, which limits the horizon of the historian of thought and dominates the world of ideas. For those ideological and historical objects that cannot be placed under continuity, it is not the history itself that is abrupt and fractured, but merely the writer's subjective efforts are not enough, and the material is not enough. In fact, in the long history of thought, there is both continuity and breakage, and the history of Chinese thought is no exception. Because the spirit of Chinese ideology and culture or the historical spirit is continuous and consistent, If the writer of the history of thought can take into account the discontinuous phenomena in the history of thought at the same time, he tries to analyze the structure and the boundary of the particular historical object of thought. To some extent, it will avoid the limitation of continuous writing, and open a wider space of thought to the study of the history of thought.
【作者单位】：兰州财经大学马克思主义学院;
【分类号】：B2

【相似文献】