从“以知解独”到“以自解独”——论阳明学派慎独工夫转向及其哲学意义

发布时间：2018-03-21 02:30

本文选题：慎独　切入点：诚意　出处：《浙江社会科学》2017年12期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：阳明学派"以慎独为宗旨者多矣"。而阳明后学对慎独的诠释,有一个从侧重"独知"到反对以"知"解独的转向。这一转向源于阳明"良知即是独知"说在中晚明时代引发的诠释困境。在宋明理学中,朱子与阳明都以"独知"解释慎独,但阳明学派的心学立场导致"独"被局限在心的领域,由此引发阳明后学对于终极本体的解释方向和工夫下手处的激烈论辩,构成难以调和的工夫论困局。晚明时期刘宗周创造性地提出新未发已发说(体用论),以"自好自恶"取代"独知",解决了这一理论困局。刘宗周的诠释转向具有独特的思想效应,其学说与明清思想转型有着内在的理论关联。
[Abstract]:There are many Yangming schools whose aim is to be cautious and independent. And Yangming's post-school interpretation of cautious independence, There is a shift from focusing on "independent knowledge" to opposing "knowing" to dissolving independence of independence. This turn stems from the interpretation dilemma caused by Yangming's theory of "conscience is independent knowledge" in the middle and late Ming dynasties. In Song Ming's Neo-Confucianism, Zhu Zi and Yang Ming both use "independent knowledge" to interpret independence with caution. However, the position of the Yangming school of psychology led to the limitation of "independence" in the field of the mind, which led to the fierce debate about the direction of interpretation and the beginning of the work of the ultimate ontology in Yangming's post-school. In the late Ming Dynasty, Liu Zongzhou creatively put forward the theory of "new unsent", which was replaced by "self-good, self-evil" instead of "independent knowledge", which solved the dilemma of this theory. Liu Zongzhou's interpretation turned to have the following characteristics:. The unique effect of thought, Its theory and the Ming and Qing ideological transformation has an internal theoretical relationship.
【作者单位】：同济大学人文学院哲学系;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“《明儒学案》的道统论哲学及其话语特色研究”(12CZX035);国家社科基金重大项目“四书学与中国思想传统研究”(15ZDB005) 广东省社科规划青年项目(GD11YZX01) 广东高校优秀青年创新人才培养计划项目(wym11027)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：B248.2

【相似文献】