尼采对西方科学的文化批判

发布时间：2018-03-25 18:35

本文选题：尼采　切入点：科学哲学　出处：《同济大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年01期

【摘要】：文章探讨尼采对科学的批判性反思,"科学"指的是德语Wissenschaft一词所包含的更为广泛的意义。无论是在东方还是西方,尼采的著作都被读作一种严厉的批判和各种激动人心的前瞻,这些前瞻关乎现状的改变和另外的可能。文章首先重构了批判在尼采著作中所扮演的角色。批判包括解构、分析和前瞻,三者之间的平衡端赖不同的主题、需要和语境而定。这也适用于尼采的科学哲学,科学在此被看作西方文化最重要的要素之一。因此,尼采对科学的究诘总是位于一个更大的背景当中,此即他对文化、社会和智识价值与制度的分析和批判。其次,文章转向尼采后来为其早期著作《悲剧的诞生》所写的自我批判的前言,他声称,他在这本书中第一次发现了科学问题。这种原创性声称在文章最主要的第三部分得到了分析和辩护。尼采生活在一个"科学的时代",自然科学获得了文化霸权,而历史意识和批判性的自我反思瓦解了此前对绝对真理和确定性的渴念。
[Abstract]:The article discusses Nietzsche's critical reflection on science. "Science" refers to the broader meaning of the German word Wissenschaft. Whether in the East or the West, Nietzsche's works are read as a harsh critique and exciting foresight. These visions are about changes in the status quo and other possibilities. The article first reconstructs the role of criticism in Nietzsche's writings. Criticism includes deconstruction, analysis, and perspective, and the balance between the three depends on different themes. This also applies to Nietzsche's philosophy of science, where science is regarded as one of the most important elements of Western culture. The analysis and criticism of social and intellectual values and institutions. Secondly, the article turns to Nietzsche's preface to self-criticism later written for his early book, the birth of tragedy, which he claims, For the first time in this book, he finds scientific problems. This originality claims to have been analyzed and defended in the third major part of the article. Nietzsche lived in a "scientific age," and the natural sciences gained cultural hegemony. Historical consciousness and critical self-reflection disintegrated the previous thirst for absolute truth and certainty.
【作者单位】：同济大学人文学院;同济大学哲学系;
【分类号】：B516.47

【相似文献】