“因素论”和一元论唯物史观的区别

发布时间：2018-05-09 17:17

本文选题：同等程度 + 《哲学研究》　；参考：《学术交流》2017年03期

【摘要】：正张光明、俞凤在《哲学研究》2016年第12期撰文指出,"因素论"和唯物史观的区别,并不在于前者"同等程度地"看待各种因素而后者强调"经济因素"的首要作用,而在于方法论上的根本分歧。普列汉诺夫强调指出,从马克思主义历史观立场来看,用各种彼此独立的力量的相互作用来解释历史的根本动因,在方法上就是完全不正确的。社会历史并不是由许多个彼此独立的因素所组
[Abstract]:Zhang Guangming, Yu Feng, wrote in the 12th issue of philosophical Studies in 2016 that the difference between "factor theory" and historical materialism is not that the former views various factors "to the same extent" and the latter emphasizes the primary role of "economic factors." It lies in fundamental differences in methodology. Plainov emphatically pointed out that from the standpoint of Marxist view of history, it is completely incorrect to use the interaction of various independent forces to explain the fundamental causes of history. Social history is not made up of many independent factors
【分类号】：B03

【相似文献】