历史没有规律吗——驳反历史决定论

发布时间：2018-05-12 20:00

本文选题：历史决定论 + 反历史决定论　；参考：《武汉大学学报(人文科学版)》2017年06期

【摘要】：自反历史决定论于19世纪问世以来,便对曾独霸人类思想史很久的历史决定论进行了一连串强悍犀利的攻击,并形成了一条以"历史没有规律"为首要观点的理据链。历史决定论对之进行自卫反击,但只有两个反击有效,其余的则差强人意。历史决定论的最大短板是给不出一条既可与历史进程吻合,又可与人有意志自由的事实相容的历史规律。既然如此,要想彻底驳倒反历史决定论,就得找出一条这样的历史规律。而由笔者创立的制度决定论所揭示的历史规律,就可以满足这些条件。它不仅符合规律的特性,也确实称得上是关于人的活动的历史规律,同时不会否定人有意志自由。并且,从它出发,还可以实现对未来的成功预言,化解终极原因的诘难和解释历史进化何以可能的难题。
[Abstract]:Since the counter-historical determinism came out in the 19th century, it has made a series of fierce and sharp attacks on the historical determinism, which has dominated the history of human thought for a long time, and formed a chain of arguments based on the view that "history has no law". Historical determinism retaliates in self-defense, but only two counterattacks are effective, while the rest are less than satisfactory. The biggest weakness of historical determinism is that it can not give a historical law which can not only be consistent with the historical process but also compatible with the fact that people have free will. In that case, to completely refute historical determinism, one must find such a law of history. The historical law revealed by the institutional determinism created by the author can satisfy these conditions. It not only accords with the characteristics of law, but also can be called the historical law of human activity, and it does not deny that man has free will. Moreover, from it, we can realize the successful prediction of the future, resolve the question of ultimate cause and explain the possible problem of historical evolution.
【作者单位】：华中科技大学哲学系;
【基金】：中央高校基本科研研究费项目(2016) 教育部人文社会科学一般项目(14YJA720002)
【分类号】：B03

【相似文献】