德国早期启蒙运动中的哲学方法之争——一场围绕沃尔夫哲学展开的争论

发布时间：2018-05-13 05:28

本文选题：哲学方法 + 数学方法　；参考：《哲学动态》2017年08期

【摘要】：德国启蒙运动时期学者对哲学方法问题的重视,肇始于沃尔夫和吕迪格学派之间旷日持久的方法之争。但相关研究者大都认为这一哲学方法之争只是对17世纪英法学界方法之争的重复,沃尔夫的哲学方法只是对古代数学证明方法的简单模仿。本文认为,沃尔夫对哲学方法的独特理解使他超然于方法争论之上,而吕迪格学派之所以一再批评他混淆了哲学方法和数学方法,目的在于避免其哲学方法在神学领域的应用所可能导致的激进后果。
[Abstract]:The scholars' attention to the philosophical method in the Enlightenment period began with the protracted dispute between Wolff and the Rudiger School. However, most of the researchers think that the controversy of philosophical methods is only a repetition of that of the English and French scholars in the 17th century, and that Wolfe's philosophical method is only a simple imitation of the methods of ancient mathematical proof. This paper argues that Wolfe's unique understanding of philosophical methods makes him transcend the debate over methods, and that the Rudiger school has repeatedly criticized him for confusing philosophical and mathematical methods. The aim is to avoid the radical consequences of its philosophical application in theology.
【作者单位】：上海交通大学人文学院哲学系;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目“德国启蒙运动时期沃尔夫主义形而上学流变研究(1720~1759)”(16CZX040)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：B516.2

【相似文献】