站在“中华立

发布时间：2018-05-26 23:15

本文选题：汤氏哲学 + 三大坐标　；参考：《广东社会科学》2017年05期

【摘要】：考察"印度佛教传入中国史",汤一介师总结出"比较哲学"中"依附-影响"、"相符-大影响"、"超出-长影响"之三条规律,"求同法"、"求异法"与"求新法"之三大方法等,并极具创意地构建出"比较哲学"中"非有非无"、"非常非断"、"非实非虚"之三大坐标。与丹普弗等"欧西中心主义之比较哲学"、格拉泽纳普等"印度中心主义之比较哲学"以及安乐哲等"中西并置之比较哲学"不同,汤师之"比较哲学"书写,是站在"中华立场"而展开,是他们之外的另一种"比较哲学"类型,其"格式"是"中华主义"的,是"并置中之偏中派"。通过"比较哲学"而构建"世界哲学",是日本中村元与美国巴姆之共同目标;然汤师却未步其后尘,成功绕过"世界哲学"陷阱,自始即不将"比较哲学"之目标设定为构建"世界哲学"。
[Abstract]:After reviewing the introduction of Indian Buddhism into Chinese history, Tang Yijie Master sums up three laws of "attachment and influence", "coincidence and great influence", "transcendental and long-term influence", "seeking common ground", "seeking difference" and "seeking new methods" in Comparative philosophy, etc. And creatively construct the three coordinates of "non-existence and non-existence", "very non-broken" and "non-real non-virtual" in Comparative philosophy. Different from the comparative philosophy of Osci centrism, the comparative philosophy of Indian centralism of Glazer and the comparative philosophy of the East and the West, such as Anle Zhe, Tang Shi's "comparative philosophy" was written. It is a kind of "comparative philosophy", whose "form" is "Sinicism" and "juxtaposed in the middle". Constructing "world philosophy" through "comparative philosophy" is the common goal of Nakamura in Japan and Bam in the United States. However, Tang Shi did not follow suit and successfully bypassed the trap of "world philosophy". From the beginning, the goal of "comparative philosophy" was not set as the construction of "world philosophy".
【作者单位】：北京航空航天大学人文与社会科学高等研究院;比利时根特大学艺术与哲学学院南亚与东亚语言文化系;
【基金】：北京市社会科学基金重点项目“中西哲学比较研究史论”(项目号15ZXA005) 国家社会科学基金项目“中华比较哲学史论”(项目号16BZX035) 全国文化名家暨“四个一批”人才项目“化西文献编纂及研究”(中宣办发[2015]49号)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：B26

【相似文献】