日本对“他者”的处理模式与“第一哲学”缺失

发布时间：2018-06-18 10:44

本文选题：他者 + 自我　；参考：《哲学研究》2017年06期

【摘要】：自神道被设定为"自我"的根本和象征以来,日本对"他者"的借助行动便次第呈视为"相对"一切外来事物的循环。神道的"中空"装置,无疑需要外来观念的填充和补强,其"吸纳-排除""再吸纳-再排除"等对"他者"的"相对化"处理模式,也曾在"不离自性"的意义上给日本带去过价值选择的自由度和对外取舍的主动性。但是,这种只局限于应对的"他者对待方式",并没有让日本走出实用主义的苑囿;而不可"理"喻的神秘主义,也无法帮助神道从"他者"身上摄入"作为存在之存在"的"第一哲学"要义。日本历代学人在努力为本国文化提取出"可以解答一切问题的方程"时之所以会常常陷于喜忧参半之境地,与上述"他者"对待范式中所固有的理论极限有着内在、本质和必然的关联。
[Abstract]:Since Shinto was set as the root and symbol of "self", Japan's assistance to the "other" was regarded as a cycle of "relative" all foreign things. The "hollow" device of Shinto no doubt needs the filling and strengthening of foreign concepts, and its "absorbing-excluding" and "reabsorbing-excluding" modes of dealing with the "other" are "relative". It has also brought Japan the freedom of value choice and the initiative of foreign choice. However, this "other treatment", which is confined to dealing with it, has not allowed Japan to leave the realm of pragmatism; it cannot be "reasoned" with mysticism. Nor does it help the Shinto to ingest the first philosophy of being from the other. When Japanese scholars tried to extract "equations that can solve all problems" for their own culture, they were often in a mixed situation, which was inherent in the theoretical limits inherent in the "other" treatment paradigm. The connection between nature and necessity.
【作者单位】：东北师范大学历史文化学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目“东亚史上的‘落差-稳定’结构与区域走向分析”(编号15ZDB063)的结项成果之一
【分类号】：B313

【参考文献】