徐昂《京氏易传笺》研究

发布时间：2018-07-05 14:49

本文选题：徐昂 + 京氏易传　；参考：《湘潭大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：京房易学是西汉官方易学的代表,而《京氏易传》是京房仅存著作,开后世熔阴阳五行、干支纳甲于一炉的易学研究风气之先,其重要性不言而喻。《京氏易传》有孙吴陆绩注,过于简略,颇难理解。民国徐昂为此书作笺,其笺甚为精博,兼释京书和陆注,是目前对《京氏易传》最详细的笺释之作。后世学者对于徐昂的《京氏易传笺》时有引之,然全面系统的研究之作则未有,鉴于此,论文即以《京氏易传笺》为研究对象。文章对徐昂的生平、著作、治学理念进行介绍与阐释,探讨《京氏易传笺》的笺释渊源与创作背景,知其人,论其世,以为《京氏易传笺》的研究提供基础准备。《京氏易传笺》之旨有二:一是订正京书的讹误,二是笺释京氏易学的体例,两者是论文论述的主体。对于第一点,论文主要对其勘误成就进行解析,对其偶失之处进行订补。对于第二点,依据徐昂笺释之法,分申注、附注、订注和补注四方面进行论述。申注即依京房和陆绩的发凡例详加注释;附注则是对诸家易说,义可旁通,兼采以注释京书,如书中索引孟喜、郑玄和虞翻说;订注则是对京陆偶有所失,详为辩证,正其所失;补注则是对京书中不完整的地方略为增补。徐昂笺释一出,后世学者对于其中的建候积算部分的八宫建始以及气候分数的改动,提出了质疑,尤其是对徐昂改动巽兑两宫的建始,争议颇大。论文对其各种驳议辨其流别,论其是非,如有未知,则阙如也。学者们对于徐昂之说虽有质疑,并立新说,不无道理,然皆证据不足,未可遽定徐昂之说为必非。文章对《京氏易传笺》全书肯定其成就与影响,并探讨其缺点与不足,瑕不掩瑜,徐昂之后,在《京氏易传》的研究中,其笺释仍是一个绕不过去的高峰,因此徐昂的《京氏易传笺》具有里程碑式的意义。
[Abstract]:Jing Fang Yi was the representative of the official Yi study in the Western Han Dynasty, while Jing Fang's Yi Zhuan was the only book that existed in Jingfang. It was self-evident before the Yi study atmosphere of opening up the later generations to melt Yin Yang and five elements, and the dry branches and the armour were in the same furnace. [Jing Yi Zhuan] has Sun Wu Luji Note. It is too simple to understand. In the Republic of China, Xu Ang wrote the book, which was very precise, and also interpreted Beijing Book and Lu Note, which was the most detailed interpretation of Jing Shi Yi Zhuan at present. Later scholars have cited Xu ang's "Jing's Yi Zhuan Notes", but no comprehensive and systematic research has been done. In view of this, the thesis takes "King's Yi Zhuan Notes" as the research object. This paper introduces and interprets Xu Ang's life, works and academic ideas, probes into the origin and background of his notes, knows the people, and discusses the world. The purpose of "Jing's Yi Zhuan Paper" is two: one is to correct the error of Beijing book, the other is to explain the style of Jing's Yi study, both of which are the main body of the thesis. For the first point, the thesis mainly analyzes its error-correction achievements and makes up for its occasional loss. As for the second point, according to Xu'ang 's interpretation method, it is discussed in four aspects: the method of interpretation, the annotation, the note, the binding note and the supplementary note. The notes are annotated in detail according to the issuing examples of Jing Fang and Lu Ji. The notes refer to Zhujiayi, saying that the meaning can be bypassed, and taking notes on Beijing books, such as the index of Meng Xi, Zheng Xuan and Yu Quan in the book. The supplement is a slight supplement to the incomplete parts of the Beijing book. Xu Nangjian explained that later scholars have questioned the changes in the eight houses and the climate scores in the part of building climate products, especially in the case of Xu's modification of the founding of the two houses of Sundwe. In this paper, it is discussed that what is right or wrong, if there is unknown, it is absent. Although scholars have doubts about Xu'anzhi 's theory, it is not unreasonable, but all of them have insufficient evidence, and Xu'anzhi 's theory cannot be regarded as inevitable. The article affirms its achievement and influence to the book of Jing's Yi Zhuan, and discusses its shortcomings and shortcomings. After Xu Ang, in the study of Jing's Yi Zhuan, its interpretation is still a peak that cannot be bypassed. Therefore, Xu'ang 's "King's Yi Zhuan Notes" has milestone significance.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B221

【参考文献】