明清学术转换的桥梁与清初学术主流:论清初新理学

发布时间：2018-07-05 15:58

本文选题：清初新理学 + 明清学术转向　；参考：《文史哲》2017年06期

【摘要】：明清学术转向不是传统所认为的从理学到考据学的"一步到位",而是先由明代学术激变出"清初新理学",再由之蜕变出清代理学、考据学、桐城派等清学各派的"二次转换"。以清初遗民集团为主体的清初理学家基于理学基本价值关怀,一反晚明从理学教条出发的治学思路,推崇以问题为导向,兼容并包,致力于中国17世纪危机的解决及理学基本价值与社会现实的再平衡,"清初新理学"应运而生。"清初新理学"是清初时代主题在学术上的反映,是明清学术转换的桥梁,是清初学术主流、清学各派的源头,对清初政治,特别是满人统治集团的汉化产生了巨大影响。基于时代主题及地域学术格局的变动,清初和晚清以来主流学界对清初新理学建构出两种图像,前者以孙奇逢、黄宗羲、李槞"三大儒"为领军,后者重视顾炎武、黄宗羲、王夫之"三大家"。
[Abstract]:The academic turn of the Ming and Qing dynasties is not the "one step" from the Neo-Confucianism to the textual research, but the "new Neo-Confucianism" in the early Qing Dynasty, and then the "second transformation" of the Qing schools such as the Qing Dynasty, the textual Studies, the Tongcheng School and so on. Based on the basic value concern of Neo-Confucianism, the Neo-Neo-Confucianism in early Qing Dynasty, based on the basic value concern of Neo-Confucianism, set out from the doctrine of Neo-Confucianism against the late Ming Dynasty, advocating problem-oriented and all-inclusive. Committed to the resolution of the 17 th century crisis in China and the rebalance between the basic values of Neo-Confucianism and social reality, Neo-Confucianism in the early Qing Dynasty emerged as the times require. " Neo-Confucianism in the early Qing Dynasty is the academic reflection of the theme of the early Qing Dynasty, the bridge of academic transformation in the Ming and Qing dynasties, and the academic mainstream in the early Qing Dynasty. The source of the various schools of learning in the Qing Dynasty has had a great impact on the politics of the early Qing Dynasty, especially on the Sinicization of the Manchu ruling group. Based on the change of the theme of the times and the change of the regional academic pattern, the mainstream scholars have constructed two kinds of images of the Neo-Confucianism in the early Qing Dynasty and the late Qing Dynasty. The former is led by Sun Qi, Huang Zongxi and Li Li, and the latter attaches importance to Gu Yanwu and Huang Zongxi. Wang Fuzhi, the Big three.
【作者单位】：河北师范大学历史文化学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金一般项目“晚清民国中州理学研究”(17BZS078)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：B249

【相似文献】