朱止泉论朱熹“以主敬涵养为先”及其与陆王的异同——基于现代朱子学研究的视角

发布时间：2018-07-08 13:04

本文选题：朱止泉 + 《朱子圣学考略》　；参考：《江苏行政学院学报》2017年02期

【摘要】：朱熹继承程颐讲“涵养须用敬,进学则在致知”,强调涵养与穷理相互贯通,并且认为涵养为穷理之本。然而,朱熹之后,宗朱派把涵养与穷理分别开来,只讲朱熹以穷理为主而讳言涵养,并以此区别于陆学;王阳明以为朱熹早年、中年主于穷理、晚年主于涵养而同于陆学,撰《朱子晚年定论》,同时又斥朱熹格物穷理是“析心与理而为二”。对此,清代朱子学家朱止泉著《朱子圣学考略》,通过对朱熹一生为学以居敬涵养为主的分析,建构朱熹的涵养论,强调朱熹“以主敬涵养为先”,“始之以涵养始,终之以涵养终”,并且认为朱熹的涵养由于与穷理相互贯通,而不同于陆王,高于陆王,为孔孟正脉。这一观点,对于今天研究朱子学及其与陆王的异同,仍具有重要的参考价值。
[Abstract]:Zhu Xi inherited Cheng Yi's statement that "conservation must be respected, while learning is brought to light", emphasizing that conservation and poverty are interlinked, and that conservation is the foundation of poverty. However, after Zhu Xi, the Zongzhu school separated conservation from poor theory, saying only that Zhu Xi was mainly concerned with poor theory, and that it was different from terrestrial science. Wang Yangming thought that in the early years of Zhu Xi, the middle age was dominated by poor reason, and in later years he was the same as terrestrial science. Writing the conclusion of Zhu Zi's later years and denouncing Zhu Xi's poverty is "analyzing the mind and reason as two". In this regard, Zhu Zhiquan, a scholar of Zhu Ziquan in the Qing Dynasty, wrote an examination of Zhu Zisheng's study. Through the analysis of Zhu Xi's lifetime study, he constructed Zhu Xi's theory of conserving, emphasizing that Zhu Xi "takes the main respect for self-cultivation as the first" and "begins with self-cultivation". In the end, the author thinks that the conservation of Zhu Xi is different from King Lu and higher than that of King Lu, because of the mutual connection between the Zhu Xi and the poor reason, it is the positive vein of Confucius and Mencius. This view still has important reference value for the study of Zhu Zi and its similarities and differences with Lu Wang today.
【作者单位】：厦门大学哲学系;
【分类号】：B249

【相似文献】