认知分歧中的证据与合理性
发布时间：2018-07-24 08:18
【摘要】：在当代知识论中,面对旗鼓相当的认知伙伴之间产生的认知分歧,如何做出恰当的反应并保持合理性是一个重要议题。人们普遍承认,证据在认知辩护的过程中发挥着重要作用。而根据"唯一性论题",同一证据集能够确定关于特定命题的、合乎理性的命题态度是唯一的。因此,产生认知分歧的各方中至少有一方是不合乎理性的,需要作出改变。折中主义与固执己见论作为当前两种最流行的处理认知分歧的立场,前者要求产生分歧的双方各退一步,同时降低自身先前的主观置信度,取一个中间值才合乎理性,而后者是指在没有获得压倒性的证据对自身最初的命题态度构成严重挑战的情况下,人们有充分的理由坚持原来的立场。事实上,上述两种立场都不成立。原因在于,认知合理性不是静态的,而是会随着证据的更新呈现动态变化。在面对认知分歧的时候,真正合理的反应是及时更新并重估其掌握的全部证据,由此决定是否以及如何调整命题态度。
[Abstract]:In contemporary knowledge theory, how to respond appropriately and maintain rationality is an important issue in the face of cognitive differences among cognitive partners. It is generally acknowledged that evidence plays an important role in the process of cognitive defense. According to the "uniqueness theory", the same evidence set can determine that the rational propositional attitude regarding a particular proposition is unique. As a result, at least one of the parties with cognitive differences is irrational and needs to change. Eclecticism and dogmatism are two of the most popular positions for dealing with cognitive differences. The former requires the two parties who are divided to step back, and at the same time reduce their previous subjective confidence and take an intermediate value to be rational. The latter means that people have good reasons to stick to their original position without obtaining overwhelming evidence to challenge their original propositional attitude seriously. In fact, neither of these positions holds true. The reason is that cognitive rationality is not static, but changes with the update of evidence. In the face of cognitive differences, the real and reasonable response is to update and reassess all the evidence available to them in time to decide whether and how to adjust their propositional attitude.
【作者单位】： 云南大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：云南大学2016年度“东陆中青年骨干教师”培养计划(项目编号:WX069051)资助
【分类号】：B017
本文编号：2140784
[Abstract]:In contemporary knowledge theory, how to respond appropriately and maintain rationality is an important issue in the face of cognitive differences among cognitive partners. It is generally acknowledged that evidence plays an important role in the process of cognitive defense. According to the "uniqueness theory", the same evidence set can determine that the rational propositional attitude regarding a particular proposition is unique. As a result, at least one of the parties with cognitive differences is irrational and needs to change. Eclecticism and dogmatism are two of the most popular positions for dealing with cognitive differences. The former requires the two parties who are divided to step back, and at the same time reduce their previous subjective confidence and take an intermediate value to be rational. The latter means that people have good reasons to stick to their original position without obtaining overwhelming evidence to challenge their original propositional attitude seriously. In fact, neither of these positions holds true. The reason is that cognitive rationality is not static, but changes with the update of evidence. In the face of cognitive differences, the real and reasonable response is to update and reassess all the evidence available to them in time to decide whether and how to adjust their propositional attitude.
【作者单位】： 云南大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：云南大学2016年度“东陆中青年骨干教师”培养计划(项目编号:WX069051)资助
【分类号】：B017
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 宋荣;;当代心灵哲学中的命题态度及其内容[J];哲学动态;2010年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 张千一;心灵哲学中的命题态度研究[D];吉林大学;2015年
，本文编号：2140784
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2140784.html
