历史唯物主义的双重解释原则
发布时间：2018-07-25 12:21
【摘要】：对于"历史唯物主义的解释原则"这一问题,学界主要有两条不同的解释路径:一是以"历史"作为解释原则的解释路径;二是以"唯物主义"作为解释原则的解释路径。在这两条路径的争论中,学者们主要探讨了历史唯物主义实现的是"世界观"变革还是"历史观"变革,却忽略了"历史"原则与"唯物主义"原则的内在关联。因此,我们在理解历史唯物主义的解释原则时,必须在"历史"与"唯物主义"的双重解释原则的"互释"中展开讨论。一方面,坚持以"历史"作为解释原则,在与以往旧唯物主义解释原则的比较中,实现对旧唯物主义(包括古典政治经济学)的超越;另一方面,坚持以"唯物主义"作为建构基础,在与黑格尔的"历史"的解释原则的比较中,实现对历史唯心主义的超越。只有在这两者的互释中,我们才能使历史唯物主义成为一门关于现实的人及其历史发展的科学。
[Abstract]:There are two different ways to interpret the principle of historical materialism: one is to take "history" as the interpretation path, and the other is to take "materialism" as the interpretation path of interpretation principle. In the debate of these two paths, scholars mainly discuss whether historical materialism realizes the transformation of "world outlook" or "historical view", but neglects the internal relation between "historical" principle and "materialism" principle. Therefore, when we understand the interpretation principle of historical materialism, we must discuss the "mutual interpretation" of the dual interpretation principle of "history" and "materialism". On the one hand, we should adhere to the principle of "history" as the interpretation principle and achieve the transcendence of the old materialism (including classical political economy) in the comparison with the old materialism; on the other hand, The author insists on taking "materialism" as the construction basis and transcends historical idealism in comparison with Hegel's interpretation principle of "history". Only in the mutual interpretation of the two, we can make historical materialism into a science about the reality of human beings and their historical development.
【作者单位】： 吉林大学哲学社会学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“历史唯物主义中的语言学问题研究”(17BZX025) 吉林大学基本科研业务费项目“唯物史观的认知隐喻学研究”(2017BS006)
【分类号】：B03
本文编号：2143803
[Abstract]:There are two different ways to interpret the principle of historical materialism: one is to take "history" as the interpretation path, and the other is to take "materialism" as the interpretation path of interpretation principle. In the debate of these two paths, scholars mainly discuss whether historical materialism realizes the transformation of "world outlook" or "historical view", but neglects the internal relation between "historical" principle and "materialism" principle. Therefore, when we understand the interpretation principle of historical materialism, we must discuss the "mutual interpretation" of the dual interpretation principle of "history" and "materialism". On the one hand, we should adhere to the principle of "history" as the interpretation principle and achieve the transcendence of the old materialism (including classical political economy) in the comparison with the old materialism; on the other hand, The author insists on taking "materialism" as the construction basis and transcends historical idealism in comparison with Hegel's interpretation principle of "history". Only in the mutual interpretation of the two, we can make historical materialism into a science about the reality of human beings and their historical development.
【作者单位】： 吉林大学哲学社会学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“历史唯物主义中的语言学问题研究”(17BZX025) 吉林大学基本科研业务费项目“唯物史观的认知隐喻学研究”(2017BS006)
【分类号】：B03
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张鹏翔;实践的内在矛盾及其历史应答[J];理论探讨;2001年06期
2 刘福森;生存的关照:历史唯物主义的解释原则[J];理论探讨;2002年02期
3 张士清,邹之坤;从历史唯物主义到历史解释原则[J];吉林师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2003年03期
4 盛栩铮;;试析世界观意义的历史唯物主义的解释原则[J];理论观察;2009年02期
5 吴宏政,高和荣;历史解释原则:马克思的“形而上学”[J];莱阳农学院学报(社会科学版);2003年02期
6 吴宏政;如何破解作为“世界观”意义的历史唯物主义[J];贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版);2002年05期
7 程彪;;历史唯物主义的核心范畴:“物质生活的生产方式”[J];吉林大学社会科学学报;2011年05期
8 王成;;进步观念的困境及其出路[J];云南社会科学;2012年01期
9 赵越;;浅谈历史唯物主义[J];金田;2013年12期
10 刘连强;;论“世界观”意义上的历史唯物主义[J];北华大学学报(社会科学版);2007年02期
，本文编号：2143803
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2143803.html
