清末纪年之争中的世界惯例与民族立场
发布时间：2018-08-27 11:35
【摘要】：康有为基于早年的理想思考首倡孔子纪年,其后经梁启超等人的倡导,促使思想界关注纪年问题,拉开了清末的纪年之争。各争论者的主张看似差别甚大,但都受益于世界纪年惯例使用划一纪年及纪元具有民族象征性的启示。他们主张迎合划一纪年的趋势,但拒绝采用西方纪年,主张立足于传统历史文化来重建新的纪年方式,分歧在于加载给纪年的象征意义不同。康有为的孔子纪年偏重于文化意义,梁启超的孔子纪年既关注文化又关注政治,钱玄同的"共和"纪年偏重于史籍记载的可靠性,革命派的黄帝纪年则偏重于汉民族主义象征。就大多数争论者都持民族立场而言,纪年之争体现了传统纪年制度向近代的转换。
[Abstract]:Kang Youwei, based on his early ideal thinking, initiated the annals of Confucius, and then started the struggle for the chronology of the late Qing Dynasty through the advocacy of Liang Qichao and others, which prompted the ideological circle to pay attention to the issue of the chronology of the year. Although the arguments may seem very different, they all benefit from the symbolic enlightenment of the use of uniform years and epoch in the world. They advocate to cater to the trend of the same century, but refuse to adopt the western chronology, and stand on the basis of the traditional history and culture to rebuild the new chronology. The difference lies in the difference in the symbolic significance of loading the chronicle. Kang Youwei's Confucius chronology is focused on cultural significance, Liang Qichao's Confucius chronicle pays attention to both culture and politics, Qian Xuantong's "Republican" chronicle focuses on the reliability of historical records, and the revolutionary Huangdi's chronicle focuses on the symbol of Han nationalism. As far as the majority of the controversies are concerned, the dispute reflects the transition from the traditional chronological system to the modern one.
【作者单位】： 中山大学哲学系;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究规划青年基金项目(15YJC720018) 广州市软科学项目“西学东渐与广州21世纪海上丝绸之路”的阶段性成果 广州市人文社会科学重点研究基地中山大学广州与中外文化交流研究中心资助
【分类号】：B25
，
本文编号：2207150
[Abstract]:Kang Youwei, based on his early ideal thinking, initiated the annals of Confucius, and then started the struggle for the chronology of the late Qing Dynasty through the advocacy of Liang Qichao and others, which prompted the ideological circle to pay attention to the issue of the chronology of the year. Although the arguments may seem very different, they all benefit from the symbolic enlightenment of the use of uniform years and epoch in the world. They advocate to cater to the trend of the same century, but refuse to adopt the western chronology, and stand on the basis of the traditional history and culture to rebuild the new chronology. The difference lies in the difference in the symbolic significance of loading the chronicle. Kang Youwei's Confucius chronology is focused on cultural significance, Liang Qichao's Confucius chronicle pays attention to both culture and politics, Qian Xuantong's "Republican" chronicle focuses on the reliability of historical records, and the revolutionary Huangdi's chronicle focuses on the symbol of Han nationalism. As far as the majority of the controversies are concerned, the dispute reflects the transition from the traditional chronological system to the modern one.
【作者单位】： 中山大学哲学系;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究规划青年基金项目(15YJC720018) 广州市软科学项目“西学东渐与广州21世纪海上丝绸之路”的阶段性成果 广州市人文社会科学重点研究基地中山大学广州与中外文化交流研究中心资助
【分类号】：B25
，
本文编号：2207150
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2207150.html
