李栗谷《人心道心图说》中的“图”纠错
发布时间：2018-09-14 16:50
【摘要】：李栗谷的《人心道心图说》中的"图"存在严重错误。在"说"中对人心的规定是有善有恶,而"图"中人心的指向仅仅为恶;在"说"中对四端的规定是道心及人心之善,而"图"中四端仅指道心而未涵盖人心之善。于是,"图"与"说"就存在严重冲突。其实,"图"对人心的描述属于栗谷人心道心思想的前说,而"说"对人心的看法则属于其人心道心思想的后说。导致"图"存在错误的原因,可以区分为非学术原因与学术原因。"图"之错误造成了比较严重的后果,因而不应轻视。应该在"图"中的"人心"一词与"善"一词之间加上一条直线,从而既明确了人心有善有恶,又说明了四端涵盖道心及人心之善。一旦这样修改,就消除了"图"与"说"之间的不一致。
[Abstract]:There are serious mistakes in Li Ligu's "diagram of the Tao and mind". There are good and evil in "saying", but in "diagram" the direction of human heart is only evil; in "saying" the stipulation of "four ends" is "Tao" and "heart", while "diagram" four ends "refers only to" Tao "and does not cover the" good "of the human heart. Thus, there is a serious conflict between "picture" and "theory". As a matter of fact, the description of the human heart in "Tu" belongs to the former theory of Li Gu's thought of Taoism, while the view of "saying" belongs to the latter. The causes of errors in the picture can be divided into non-academic and academic causes. " The mistake in the picture has serious consequences and should not be taken lightly. A straight line should be added between the word "human heart" and the word "good" in "diagram", which not only makes clear that there is good and evil in the heart, but also shows that the four ends cover the mind of Tao and the good of the heart. Once amended in this way, the inconsistency between diagram and theory is eliminated.
【作者单位】： 厦门大学哲学系;
【基金】：福建省社科规划办重点项目“东亚朱子学中的人心道心问题研究”(编号:FJ2016A026) 教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助项目“东亚朱子学中的人心道心问题”(编号:2016JHQ017) 国家社科基金重大项目“东亚朱子学的承传与创新研究”(编号:13&ZD062)
【分类号】：B312
本文编号：2243293
[Abstract]:There are serious mistakes in Li Ligu's "diagram of the Tao and mind". There are good and evil in "saying", but in "diagram" the direction of human heart is only evil; in "saying" the stipulation of "four ends" is "Tao" and "heart", while "diagram" four ends "refers only to" Tao "and does not cover the" good "of the human heart. Thus, there is a serious conflict between "picture" and "theory". As a matter of fact, the description of the human heart in "Tu" belongs to the former theory of Li Gu's thought of Taoism, while the view of "saying" belongs to the latter. The causes of errors in the picture can be divided into non-academic and academic causes. " The mistake in the picture has serious consequences and should not be taken lightly. A straight line should be added between the word "human heart" and the word "good" in "diagram", which not only makes clear that there is good and evil in the heart, but also shows that the four ends cover the mind of Tao and the good of the heart. Once amended in this way, the inconsistency between diagram and theory is eliminated.
【作者单位】： 厦门大学哲学系;
【基金】：福建省社科规划办重点项目“东亚朱子学中的人心道心问题研究”(编号:FJ2016A026) 教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助项目“东亚朱子学中的人心道心问题”(编号:2016JHQ017) 国家社科基金重大项目“东亚朱子学的承传与创新研究”(编号:13&ZD062)
【分类号】：B312
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李明辉;;李玄逸的四端七情论[J];深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版);2011年05期
2 金源姬;浅谈栗谷的四端七情论[J];孔子研究;2004年01期
3 崔昌海,新元;“四端理之发,七情气之发”一语来源之考[J];延边大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1999年04期
4 肖君平;再辩“四端七情”理气论[J];东疆学刊;2005年04期
5 金仁权;;退溪与奇明彦四端七情之辩及其意义[J];东疆学刊;2007年03期
6 洪军;;论同春堂的四端七情说[J];韩国研究论丛;2008年01期
7 邢丽菊;;朝鲜时期儒学者对孟子“四端说”的阐释——以退溪、栗谷与茶山为中心[J];齐鲁文化研究;2006年00期
8 邢丽菊;;朝鲜时期儒学者对孟子“四端说”的阐释——以退溪、栗谷与茶山为中心[J];社会科学战线;2006年06期
9 金香花;;孟子“四端”说流衍考辨——以朱熹与韩儒为中心[J];东南学术;2013年05期
10 罗安宪;;李退溪与奇高峰关于四端七情的论辩[J];孔子研究;2009年04期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 史向前;;管子“四维”与孟子“四端”道德的不同旨趣[A];安徽省管子研究会2010年年会暨全国第五届管子学术研讨会交流论文集[C];2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 郁梦恬;《孟子》“四端”说研究[D];华东师范大学;2016年
2 徐志成;李退溪与奇高峰的“四端七情”论探析[D];延边大学;2009年
，本文编号：2243293
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2243293.html
