中国易学史上爻变说的变迁与丁若镛的爻变说
发布时间：2018-10-12 15:36
【摘要】：在丁若镛的易学理论中,爻变说是《周易》解释的最基本方法。丁若镛认为,自文王作《易》始便以爻变为前提,这在古代经传的诸多观点中皆可得到印证。汉代是象数易学的天下,其代表人物虞翻虽未特别提出关于爻变的理论,但却对爻变进行了灵活的运用;魏晋时期,玄学义理易最重要人物王弼虽不重视爻变说,但后来爻变说却并未从易学史上消失,反而被继承了下来。进入宋代,爻变说得以理论化。宋代以后,其理论渐渐严密起来。到元明清时代,爻变说仍被看作是《周易》解释的基础。在中国易学史上,爻变说虽源远流长、绵绵不断,但却未曾出现像丁若镛一样彻底将爻变和推移结合起来解释的事例。此即茶山易学在东亚易学史上的意义所在。
[Abstract]:In Ding Ruoyong's theory of Yi, the theory of line change is the most basic method of interpretation. Ding Ruoyong thinks that the line has become the premise since the beginning of Wen Wang's Book of changes, which can be confirmed in many viewpoints of ancient classics. The Han Dynasty was the world of the Book of changes of Image and number, whose representative, Yu Fan, did not put forward the theory of line change in particular, but used it flexibly. In the Wei and Jin dynasties, Wang Bi, the most important figure in metaphysics, did not attach importance to the theory of line change. However, the line-changing theory did not disappear from the history of the Book of changes, but was inherited. Into the Song Dynasty, the line changes to theorize. After the Song Dynasty, its theory gradually tightened up. By the time of Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties, the theory of line change was still regarded as the basis of interpretation of the Book of changes. In the history of the Book of changes in China, the theory of line change has a long history, but it has not been explained completely as Ding Ruoyong did. This is the significance of Chashan Yi in the history of East Asian Yi.
【作者单位】： 韩国大真大学人文学研究所;韩国成均馆大学儒学系;
【分类号】：B221;B312
本文编号：2266669
[Abstract]:In Ding Ruoyong's theory of Yi, the theory of line change is the most basic method of interpretation. Ding Ruoyong thinks that the line has become the premise since the beginning of Wen Wang's Book of changes, which can be confirmed in many viewpoints of ancient classics. The Han Dynasty was the world of the Book of changes of Image and number, whose representative, Yu Fan, did not put forward the theory of line change in particular, but used it flexibly. In the Wei and Jin dynasties, Wang Bi, the most important figure in metaphysics, did not attach importance to the theory of line change. However, the line-changing theory did not disappear from the history of the Book of changes, but was inherited. Into the Song Dynasty, the line changes to theorize. After the Song Dynasty, its theory gradually tightened up. By the time of Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties, the theory of line change was still regarded as the basis of interpretation of the Book of changes. In the history of the Book of changes in China, the theory of line change has a long history, but it has not been explained completely as Ding Ruoyong did. This is the significance of Chashan Yi in the history of East Asian Yi.
【作者单位】： 韩国大真大学人文学研究所;韩国成均馆大学儒学系;
【分类号】：B221;B312
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 邓球柏;爻变与卦变:组合创新[J];哲学研究;2003年02期
2 李勤德;《周易》爻变与“得位”、“中正”说[J];广州师院学报(社会科学版);1995年04期
3 黄开国;春秋时期的《易》筮[J];玉溪师范学院学报;2004年11期
4 田以樵;;《焦氏易林》的编撰及其与《周易》的若干关系——以“一爻变”的卦例为中心[J];中州学刊;2013年03期
5 乾元亨;;纳甲筮法讲座(四)[J];周易研究;1993年03期
6 蓝甲云,黄桂芳;《周易》乾坤之策分析[J];长沙电力学院学报(社会科学版);2000年02期
7 于成宝;;从“数字卦”看《易经》的形成过程[J];社会科学家;2007年04期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 王化平;;“艮之八”、“泰之八”和“贞屯悔豫”新解[A];学行堂文史集刊——2012年第1期[C];2012年
，本文编号：2266669
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2266669.html
