“连续性”视野中的中国思维
发布时间：2018-11-01 18:41
【摘要】：文章是以"连续性"视野即理论来考察中国思维的基本状况。"连续性"理论由张光直明确提出,其对于解释"连续性"文明形态的发生与发展有着很高的契合度。中国古代思维是"连续性"思维的一个典型样本,通过对它的考察,我们既可以了解中国思维的"连续性"特征,也可以验证张光直"连续性"理论的有效性。文章具体包括以下内容:一、原始社会与早期文明思维的普遍状况;二、中国原始社会时期的思维状况;三、三代(早期文明)时期的思维状况;四、春秋战国时期(轴心时期)前后的思维状况;五、后续的状况;六、简短的归纳。考察表明:在古代中国,思维有着明显的"连续性"特征,这既体现在知识活动中,也体现在信仰生活中。无疑,知识活动与信仰生活各自所体现的"连续性"又有所不同。在知识领域,随着具体知识的发展与进步,"连续性"或有所改变,即理性有所增长,这尤其体现在轴心时代。当然,这种理性的增长总体而言是缓慢的,且不时有所反复。而在信仰生活中,"连续性"更具有一贯性。从某种意义上说,在中国,形成于原始期的信仰思维实际始终没有发生大的变化,这包括尽管近代在知识方面有质的"突破",但在信仰层面却依旧保持原始即"连续"的传统,至今犹然。
[Abstract]:This paper examines the basic state of Chinese thinking from the perspective of "continuity", which was clearly put forward by Zhang Guangzheng, and has a high degree of agreement in explaining the occurrence and development of the "continuity" of civilization. Ancient Chinese thinking is a typical sample of "continuity" thinking. Through the investigation of it, we can not only understand the characteristics of "continuity" of Chinese thinking, but also verify the validity of Zhang Guangzhi's "continuity" theory. The article includes the following contents: first, the general situation of primitive society and the early civilization thinking; second, the thinking condition of the primitive society period of China; third, the thinking state of the third generation (early civilization) period; Fourth, the state of thinking before and after the Spring and Autumn and warring States period (axis period); five, the status of follow-up; six, a brief summary. The investigation shows that in ancient China, thinking has the characteristic of "continuity", which is not only reflected in the knowledge activity, but also in the belief life. There is no doubt that knowledge activities and faith life reflect the "continuity" and different. In the field of knowledge, with the development and progress of specific knowledge, "continuity" may change, that is, rational growth, which is especially reflected in the axial era. Of course, this rational growth is generally slow, and from time to time repeated. In faith life, continuity is more consistent. In a sense, in China, the belief thinking formed in the primitive period has never changed greatly, including the qualitative "breakthrough" in knowledge in modern times. But at the level of faith, it still maintains the tradition of "continuity", which is still true to this day.
【作者单位】： 上海师范大学哲学—法政学院哲学与跨文化研究所;
【基金】：上海高校高峰高原学科建设项目成果
【分类号】：B21
本文编号：2304764
[Abstract]:This paper examines the basic state of Chinese thinking from the perspective of "continuity", which was clearly put forward by Zhang Guangzheng, and has a high degree of agreement in explaining the occurrence and development of the "continuity" of civilization. Ancient Chinese thinking is a typical sample of "continuity" thinking. Through the investigation of it, we can not only understand the characteristics of "continuity" of Chinese thinking, but also verify the validity of Zhang Guangzhi's "continuity" theory. The article includes the following contents: first, the general situation of primitive society and the early civilization thinking; second, the thinking condition of the primitive society period of China; third, the thinking state of the third generation (early civilization) period; Fourth, the state of thinking before and after the Spring and Autumn and warring States period (axis period); five, the status of follow-up; six, a brief summary. The investigation shows that in ancient China, thinking has the characteristic of "continuity", which is not only reflected in the knowledge activity, but also in the belief life. There is no doubt that knowledge activities and faith life reflect the "continuity" and different. In the field of knowledge, with the development and progress of specific knowledge, "continuity" may change, that is, rational growth, which is especially reflected in the axial era. Of course, this rational growth is generally slow, and from time to time repeated. In faith life, continuity is more consistent. In a sense, in China, the belief thinking formed in the primitive period has never changed greatly, including the qualitative "breakthrough" in knowledge in modern times. But at the level of faith, it still maintains the tradition of "continuity", which is still true to this day.
【作者单位】： 上海师范大学哲学—法政学院哲学与跨文化研究所;
【基金】：上海高校高峰高原学科建设项目成果
【分类号】：B21
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 温琴佐·桑福;艺术与经济[J];美术;2003年11期
2 ;[J];;年期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 徐雨森;张诗莹;张世君;;基于知识活动视角的技术中介分析[A];首届中国科技政策与管理学术研讨会2005年论文集（下）[C];2005年
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 徐暄;知识产权法：人类知识活动规律在法律上的再现[N];中国知识产权报;2004年
2 邱柏;宜宾开展送商标法律知识活动[N];中国工商报;2013年
3 徐tD;让心智与知识和财富一起增长[N];中国知识产权报;2004年
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 艾时钟;知识活动的最优资源分配建模、模式设计与影响因素研究[D];西安电子科技大学;2015年
2 潘黎;基于知识活动能力的普通高校分类研究[D];大连理工大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 瞿迪柯;基于知识活动的我国制造企业价值链优化研究[D];上海交通大学;2007年
2 张诗莹;基于知识活动视角的技术中介研究[D];大连理工大学;2006年
，本文编号：2304764
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2304764.html
