《宋元学案》的层次结构与学案设置——兼论全祖望与黄宗羲思想史观之异同
发布时间：2018-11-02 15:34
【摘要】：现行百卷本《宋元学案》的层次结构与学案设置,由其实质意义上的完成者全祖望所决定。经过全祖望的修补,在层次性质上,《宋元学案》由比较纯粹的宋元哲学史演变为宋元儒学思想史与文献资料汇编。在结构内容上,《宋元学案》的史学(史传)与学术谱系(家谱)色彩非常浓厚。在学案设置上,全祖望修定与次定的学案反映了全祖望与黄宗羲思想史观的共识,补定的学案反映了两人思想史观侧重点的分歧,补本的学案体现了全祖望对黄宗羲道学思想史体系的突破。全祖望设置学案的标准与黄宗羲在“黄氏原本”中注重思想流派与地域学术的立场相比有继承也有突破,在考虑学术脉络、地位及宗旨等纯学术因素的同时,也注重人品道德与政治事功等方面的因素。这体现了作为哲学史家的黄宗羲与作为史学家的全祖望在思想史观上的差异。
[Abstract]:The hierarchical structure of the present hundred volumes of the Song and Yuan School cases and the arrangement of the study cases are decided by the complete person in its essence. Through the revision of the whole family, in terms of the nature of the hierarchy, the case of the Song and Yuan dynasties has evolved from a relatively pure history of philosophy in the Song and Yuan dynasties to a compilation of Confucian thoughts and literature in the Song and Yuan dynasties. In terms of structure, the history of Song and Yuan Dynasty and academic genealogy (genealogy) are very strong. In the setting of the study case, the study plan revised and subdetermined by Quan Zuwang reflects the consensus between him and Huang Zongxi on the history of thought, and the study plan made up reflects the difference between the emphasis of the view on the history of thought of the two people. The supplementary learning plan reflects the breakthrough of Huang Zongxi's Taoist thought history system. Compared with Huang Zongxi's stance of attaching importance to the schools of thought and regional scholarship in the original "Huang's original," Quan Zuwang has inherited and made breakthroughs. While considering purely academic factors, such as academic context, status and purpose, he has at the same time taken into account such pure academic factors as academic context, status, and purpose. Also pays attention to the moral character and the political affairs achievement and so on aspect factor. This reflects the difference between Huang Zongxi as a philosophical historian and Quan Zuwang as a historian.
【作者单位】： 武汉大学哲学学院;
【分类号】：B244
本文编号：2306202
[Abstract]:The hierarchical structure of the present hundred volumes of the Song and Yuan School cases and the arrangement of the study cases are decided by the complete person in its essence. Through the revision of the whole family, in terms of the nature of the hierarchy, the case of the Song and Yuan dynasties has evolved from a relatively pure history of philosophy in the Song and Yuan dynasties to a compilation of Confucian thoughts and literature in the Song and Yuan dynasties. In terms of structure, the history of Song and Yuan Dynasty and academic genealogy (genealogy) are very strong. In the setting of the study case, the study plan revised and subdetermined by Quan Zuwang reflects the consensus between him and Huang Zongxi on the history of thought, and the study plan made up reflects the difference between the emphasis of the view on the history of thought of the two people. The supplementary learning plan reflects the breakthrough of Huang Zongxi's Taoist thought history system. Compared with Huang Zongxi's stance of attaching importance to the schools of thought and regional scholarship in the original "Huang's original," Quan Zuwang has inherited and made breakthroughs. While considering purely academic factors, such as academic context, status and purpose, he has at the same time taken into account such pure academic factors as academic context, status, and purpose. Also pays attention to the moral character and the political affairs achievement and so on aspect factor. This reflects the difference between Huang Zongxi as a philosophical historian and Quan Zuwang as a historian.
【作者单位】： 武汉大学哲学学院;
【分类号】：B244
【相似文献】
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 张越;《宋元学案》——学案体史书的成熟和完善[N];光明日报;2001年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 刘增丽;宋代私学教育管理研究[D];河南大学;2007年
2 刘兆玉;论《宋元学案》对张载关学的诠释[D];陕西师范大学;2013年
，本文编号：2306202
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2306202.html
