高校教师职称评审中科研评价条件研究

发布时间：2018-03-13 17:44

本文选题：科研研究　切入点：高校教师　出处：《西南交通大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：科研水平是一个国家的综合实力的重要体现,高校是国家科技创新体系的重要构成部分,承担着科学研究的重任。在加大对高校科研投入力度和实行高校教师聘任制考评的大背景下,高校教师科研工作的评价得到了我国的高度重视。高校教师职称评审是对教师科研水平、教学业绩成绩等方面的综合评价,它涉及到每一位申报教师的切身利益,关系到高校教师积极性和创造力的发挥和师资队伍的稳定和发展,因此,每年的高校教师职称评审工作都牵动着无数教师的心。基于此,本文对我国高校教师职称评审中科研评价条件进行研究,通过对国外典型创新型国家高校教师科研评价制度的学习、借鉴,结合相关管理学知识和我国高校教师科研工作实际和发展方向,对我国高校教师科研评价进行了简单的概述,具体以成都##大学为例对学校教师职称科研评价发展现状、存在的问题及其原因进行了详细分析,并根据教育部《关于深化高等学校科技评价改革意见》、《关于深化人才发展体制机制改革的意见》等文件和“2014年全国高等学校科技工作会议”,提出要加大力度对高校教师科研评价工作进行行之有效的改革,该项举措对于合理分布高校科研资源、完善科研评价体系和促进高校科研管理,有一定的参考意义。笔者对举例高校成都##大学的教师职称科研评价展开了调查与研究,发现仍然存在很多问题,包括评价导向功利化、评价标准简单化、评价方法重数量轻质量、重形式轻实质。分析其原因,主要包括评价目的、制度不一致、行政化倾向严重、对学科差异性把关不到位、没严格遵守科研活动的客观规律。上述问题对高校教师科研工作的持续健康发展产生了不好的影响,不改不行。要解决这些问题,关键在于：首先,要在理念是上秉持“教师为本”的思想,确定评价的目的和标准；其次,要建立健全高校教师科研评价制度。如结合高校科研活动规律,实行多层次分类评价；以提高科研绩效为目标,实行“层次分析法—专家评估”相结合的定性和定量相结合的评价方法；构建合理的教师职称科研评价指标体系,具体在对学校教师职称评审科研条件分析的基础上,结合高校教师科研活动现状,运用德尔菲法综合专家意见选取指标,构建指标体系,运用层次分析法计算指标权重,从而实现对高校教师职称科研的评价。
[Abstract]:The level of scientific research is an important embodiment of a country's comprehensive strength, and colleges and universities are an important part of the national scientific and technological innovation system. Undertaking the heavy task of scientific research. Under the background of increasing the investment in scientific research in colleges and universities and carrying out the evaluation of the appointment system of teachers in colleges and universities, The evaluation of university teachers' scientific research has been highly valued in our country. The evaluation of university teachers' professional titles is a comprehensive evaluation of teachers' scientific research level and teaching achievements, which involves the vital interests of each declared teacher. It is related to the enthusiasm and creativity of college teachers and the stability and development of the teaching staff. Therefore, the evaluation of teachers' titles in colleges and universities every year affects the hearts of countless teachers. This paper studies the evaluation conditions of scientific research in the evaluation of teachers' professional titles in colleges and universities in China, and draws lessons from the study of the scientific research evaluation system of the typical innovative national university teachers in foreign countries. Combined with the relevant management knowledge and the practice and development direction of university teachers' scientific research in our country, this paper gives a brief overview of the evaluation of university teachers' scientific research in our country, taking ## University of Chengdu as an example, the present situation of scientific research evaluation of teachers' professional titles in Chengdu University is given as an example. The existing problems and their causes are analyzed in detail. According to the documents of the Ministry of Education "opinions on deepening the Reform of Science and Technology Evaluation in Colleges and Universities", "opinions on deepening the Reform of the system and Mechanism of talents Development" and "the National Conference on Science and Technology work in Colleges and Universities of 2014", it is proposed that more efforts should be made to improve the quality of. The evaluation of school teachers' scientific research should be reformed effectively. This measure has certain reference significance for the rational distribution of scientific research resources in colleges and universities, the perfection of scientific research evaluation system and the promotion of scientific research management in colleges and universities. The author has carried out an investigation and research on the evaluation of teachers' professional titles in ## University of Chengdu for example. It is found that there are still many problems, including the utilitarianism of evaluation guidance, the simplification of evaluation criteria, the emphasis on quantity and quality, and the emphasis on form and substance. The above problems have a bad effect on the sustainable and healthy development of university teachers' scientific research work. The key to solve these problems lies in: first, We should adhere to the idea of "teacher-oriented" and determine the purpose and standard of evaluation. Secondly, we should establish and improve the evaluation system of university teachers' scientific research, such as carrying out multi-level classification evaluation in combination with the law of scientific research activities in colleges and universities. In order to improve the scientific research performance, a qualitative and quantitative evaluation method combining analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and expert evaluation is carried out, and a reasonable evaluation index system of scientific research for teachers' professional titles is constructed. On the basis of analyzing the scientific research condition of school teachers' professional title evaluation and combining with the present situation of university teachers' scientific research activities, using Delphi's comprehensive expert opinion to select the index, to construct the index system, and to calculate the index weight by the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). So as to realize the evaluation of academic research of teachers' titles in colleges and universities.
【学位授予单位】：西南交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：G647

【相似文献】