域名系统、网络主权与互联网治理历史反思及其当代启示

发布时间：2017-12-27 21:29

本文关键词：域名系统、网络主权与互联网治理历史反思及其当代启示　出处：《中外法学》2016年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：全球互联网治理的制度框架取决于人们对于互联网的基本观念,其核心问题是主权概念是否适用于网络空间。从互联网诞生以来,两种观念一直相互对立:一种认为互联网是不受主权管治的独立空间;另一种认为互联网治理仍从属于主权。前者是一直在国际社会流行的观念。对根域名治理史的梳理显示,主权国家一直未离开互联网,因为单一主权国家一直实际控制根域名治理权,且采取了以特定公司为授权主体进行治理的私有化模式。在此模式于近年来受到国际上的质疑后,根域名控制权争夺已进入传统国际法和国际政治范围内。未来互联网治理取决于两种互联网观念的相互调合,在于平衡个人信息自由和公共安全秩序。
[Abstract]:The institutional framework of global Internet governance depends on people's basic concept of the Internet. The core issue is whether the concept of sovereignty applies to cyberspace. Since the birth of the Internet, the two concepts have been opposite each other: one is that the Internet is independent from sovereign governance, and the other is that Internet governance still belongs to sovereignty. The former is a popular concept in the international community. The sorting out of the history of root domain governance shows that sovereign states have not left the Internet since the single sovereign state has been actually controlling the right of domain name governance, and has adopted a privatization mode that is governed by a specific company as the authorized body. After this model has been questioned internationally in recent years, the struggle for control of the root domain name has entered the traditional international law and the international political scope. The future Internet governance depends on the mutual adjustment of the two kinds of Internet concepts, which is to balance the freedom of personal information and the public security order.
【作者单位】：清华大学法学院;
【基金】：清华大学—微软创新与知识产权联合研究中心的资助
【分类号】：D922.16;D971.2
【正文快照】： 随着互联网日益深人社会生活,互联网治理成为了时代的主题。无论是宏观层面的国家安全与发展利益,还是微观层面个人权利和信息自由的保护,网络治理已成为中国法治建设的重要领域。2012年,全国人大常委会做出了《关于加强网络个人信息保护的决定》。2015年,全国人大常委会通过

【相似文献】