迈向合作规制:英国法律服务规制体制改革及其启示

发布时间：2018-01-30 03:26

本文关键词： 法律服务合作规制行政体制英国行政法　出处：《华东政法大学学报》2014年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：英国传统上以法律职业团体自我规制为主导的法律服务规制体制,对于英国法律服务业的发展发挥了重要作用,但近年来被指责为"过时、僵化、过于复杂、欠缺问责并且不够透明"。2007年《法律服务法》对传统体制做了大幅改革,包括设立了一个作为独立规制机构的法律服务理事会,使得公共规制和职业团体自我规制之间的权力配置更为合理;设立了独立的法律申诉局,致力于为法律服务市场中的消费者提供一个有效的权利救济途径;引入了替代性事务结构,允许非法律人投资者和管理人进行法律服务市场,以增强法律服务市场的竞争。这一改革对于中国法律服务规制体制的改革具有参考价值。
[Abstract]:The legal service regulation system, which has traditionally been dominated by the self-regulation of legal professional groups, has played an important role in the development of the British legal service industry, but in recent years it has been accused of being "outdated, rigid and too complex". Lack of accountability and transparency "... the legal Services Act of 2007 significantly reformed the traditional system, including the establishment of a Council of legal Services as an independent regulatory body. The allocation of power between public regulation and self-regulation of professional groups is more reasonable; (B) the establishment of an independent legal Complaints Board, which aims to provide an effective remedy for the rights of consumers in the legal services market; Alternative service structures were introduced to allow non-legal investors and managers to conduct the legal services market. In order to strengthen the competition of the legal service market, this reform has reference value for the reform of the legal service regulation system in China.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院法学研究所;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“行政法视野下的自我规制研究”(项目号11CFX045)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D956.1
【正文快照】： 健全的法律服务规制体制对于保护法律服务消费者的利益,促进法律服务业的健康发展,保证公众对法治的信心,均具有重要意义。改革开放以来,伴随着我国法律服务业的快速发展,法律服务的规制体制也逐步建立。我国目前的法律服务规制体制主要由两部分组成:一为政府规制,其主体是各

【相似文献】