比较法视域下的犯罪论体系争鸣及其启示

发布时间：2018-02-22 04:44

本文关键词： 犯罪论体系理性主义主观罪过客观主义立场学术批判　出处：《河北法学》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：犯罪论体系作为一种刑法理论的抽象归纳,具有指导刑事实践定罪的基本功能,但不应当取代刑法典的根本定罪依据功能。域外三类犯罪论体系皆秉持由客观判断到主观判断、事实判断到价值判断的犯罪认定路径,这三类犯罪论体系的要件要素的构建上均达到包含刑法典规定的犯罪成立基本条件的效果。对于犯罪论体系不能承载的功能需要刑法方法论的重大革新,如主观罪过的界定方法。行为人主观罪过的展开即行为,只有精准界定主观罪过后方能界定行为人行为的性质。犯罪论体系的构建源于学界对犯罪认定的类型化要求,其始终处于不断继承与发展的过程中,应以客观主义立场进行理性地学术批判。
[Abstract]:As an abstract induction of criminal law theory, crime theory system has the basic function of guiding criminal practice conviction, but it should not replace the fundamental conviction basis function of criminal code. The path of crime determination from fact judgment to value judgment, The construction of the elements of these three kinds of criminological systems has achieved the effect of including the basic conditions for the establishment of crimes stipulated in the Criminal Code. For the functions that the criminological system cannot carry, the major innovation of the criminal law methodology is required. For example, the definition method of subjective sin, the behavior of the subjective crime of the actor, the nature of the behavior can be defined only after the definition of the subjective sin. The construction of the crime theory system originates from the classification requirement of the academic circles to the crime cognizance. It is always in the process of inheriting and developing constantly, should carry on the rational academic criticism with the objectivism position.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学法学院;
【基金】：中央财政支持地方高校建设项目“特殊群体权利保护与犯罪预防研究创新团队”的研究成果
【分类号】：D908;D914

【相似文献】