新论题学法学方法及其应用

发布时间：2018-03-04 15:08

本文选题：论题学　切入点：法学方法　出处：《西南政法大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：亚里斯多德在《论题篇》中最早阐明了作为逻辑学重要补充的论题学理论，而西塞罗在同名著作中进一步演示出论题学可以如何结合法律案例进行实践。作为一种全新的法学方法启蒙，西塞罗在案例适用中的基本原理如同菲韦格所认为的那样：发轫自修辞学的论题学法学方法之多向度思维介入，去构建一个全新的论题目录体系。因此，不妨将西塞罗结合论题学的法律实践所蕴涵的法学方法称为西塞罗论题学法学方法。法学作为一门实践的科学,它孕育于社会生活的土壤，并反哺社会以促其发展。适用于奴隶制社会的西塞罗论题学法学方法,显然难以担当与现代纷繁的社会相契合的使命。于是，融入诸种价值考量的新论题学法学方法呼之欲出。与原有的论题学法学方法相比，其在类比等置之后增补了两个步骤：一是对围绕该漏洞问题的诸价值进行先分解后综合的探讨，即将其关诸道德、利益及其他法学外部的价值逐一罗列并根据其重要性进行位阶排序；二是将类比等置的结论置于道德等价值背景下考量，以期找出冲突之处，并针对冲突的性质对原论题目录加以修正。继而引用两种图尔敏模式对应于两种论题学法学方法进行深入浅出的解析。其中西塞罗论题学法学方法对应的是欠缺价值考量的图尔敏原始模式，简单拙朴的基本建构已初见雏形，适用于阶级结构简单的奴隶社会而滞后于复杂多变的现代社会；而新论题学法学方法对应的是加入了价值考量的非单调的图尔敏修正模式，更能与现今社会的纷繁复杂情形相契合。接下来明确了新论题学法学方法的哲学前提是实用主义哲学，并对实用主义哲学及其对新论题学法学方法的影响加以阐发。实用主义哲学着眼于“具有什么样可以想象的实际效果”，秉持“一种获得方向的态度”，向与流动着的“事实”更为契合的真理做更进一步的探索。这样一种科学的精神，使得新论题学法学方法能契合变动不居的社会现实而常变常新。最后描述了将新论题学法学方法如何应用于司法实务，，以期对论题学法学方法的实践与理论良性互动的未来全面发展有所启示。
[Abstract]:Aristotle first expounded the theory of argumentation as an important supplement to logic in his thesis. And Cicero, in his book of the same name, further demonstrates how argumentology can be combined with legal cases to practice. The basic principle of Cicero's case application is as Viehweger thinks: the multi-directional thinking of the method of thematic law originating from rhetoric is involved to construct a brand new system of subject catalogue. The legal method contained in Cicero's legal practice combined with argumentation may be called Cicero's legal method of argumentation. Law, as a practical science, is conceived in the soil of social life and nurtured society to promote its development. Obviously, it is difficult to take on the mission of consonance with modern and complicated society. Therefore, new methods of thematic jurisprudence, which are integrated with various value considerations, are on the rise. Compared with the original methods of thematic jurisprudence, It adds two steps after analogical equalization: first, to discuss the value of the loophole first and then synthetically, that is to say, to put it into morality. Interest and other external values of jurisprudence are listed one by one and ranked according to their importance; second, the conclusion of analogy equalization is considered in the context of values such as morality, in order to find out the conflict. According to the nature of the conflict, the original catalogue is revised. Then two kinds of Tourmin models are used to analyze the two methods of argumentation, among which Cicero's approach corresponds to the original model of Tourmin, which lacks value consideration. The basic construction of simplicity and simplicity has begun to take shape, which is suitable for the slave society with simple class structure and lags behind the complex and changeable modern society. It is more compatible with the complicated and complicated situation of the present society. Then it is clear that the philosophical premise of the new methodology of jurisprudence is pragmatism philosophy. The pragmatism philosophy and its influence on the law method of the new argumentation are expounded. The pragmatism philosophy aims at "what kind of imaginable practical effect", and holds "a kind of attitude to obtain the direction", and moves toward and flows. The "facts" of the more consistent truth for further exploration. Such a scientific spirit, So that the new methodology of jurisprudence can adapt to the changing social reality and often change to new. In the end, the author describes how to apply the new law method to the judicial practice, in order to enlighten the future development of the practice and theory of the law.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D90

【参考文献】