媒体监督与法院审判关系的实证研究

发布时间：2018-03-05 20:20

本文选题：媒体　切入点：法院　出处：《中国政法大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文主要通过法社会学中的访谈法、问卷调查法、文献法,对近十年来已有案例的收集来实证当下媒体监督与法院审判之间的现存关系。分析媒体监督和法院审判之间冲突的原因,运用法学理论阐述言论自由和公正审判在民主法治社会中的角色和价值,并根据媒体监督和法院审判不同特点,提出建构良性互动机制的初步构想。本文的特色是在展示媒体监督和法院审判之间关系的基础之上进行了实证分析,并就问题的解决提出自己的意见。从所涉群体人员的访谈、问卷调查结果、相关已有案例上来看,媒体监督对法院审判的影响是客观存在的,由于目前我国媒体和法院独特的管理体制和扭曲的法律文化,是引起两者冲突的根本原因。但是,媒体监督和法院审判所追求的最终目的是一致的,适度的媒体监督可以促进审判公正,排除不当干扰。反过来法院公开、公正的审判也有助于促进媒体监督权发展壮大。因此,在媒体和记者进行自律的同时,还需要法官态度的转变和法院审判公开制度的调整。通过相关法律对两者主体权利、义务进行界定,从而在它们之间构建起一种良性互动的关系。本文共分五部分: 引言部分指出了研究问题的由来,研究方法及材料的收集方法。第一章通过对记者、法官的访谈、问卷调查,十年来相关类型案例的收集,来实证媒体监督与法院审判关系的现状,发掘媒体在监督法院审判时的不当评论行为给法院的审判带来的影响。第二章对媒体监督和法院审判关系冲突现状进行分析,不仅是因为目前两界管理体制和法官、记者在相同问题上的不同认识原因外,现有规定的过时和相关法律的缺失是导致冲突产生的另一重要原因。第三章通过对言论自由与公正审判在民主法治社会中角色和价值的阐述,用法理学的理论对媒体监督与法院审判的关系进行了辩证分析,为下一步问题的解决做出理论铺垫。第四章通过对域外经验的介绍,结合笔者访谈、问卷调查结果的基础之上提出通过对媒体及其从业人员的自律和克制,法院公开制度的调整和法官思路的转变,加之相关法律的完善来达到相互尊重,相互促进的良性互动状态。
[Abstract]:This article mainly through the law sociology interview method, the questionnaire survey method, the literature method, The collection of existing cases over the past decade has demonstrated the current relationship between media supervision and court trials. The reasons for the conflict between media supervision and court trials are analyzed. Applying the theory of law to expound the role and value of freedom of expression and fair trial in a democratic society under the rule of law, and according to the different characteristics of media supervision and court adjudication, The characteristics of this paper are to analyze the relationship between media supervision and court trial, and put forward some opinions on how to solve the problem. The results of the questionnaire survey show that the influence of media supervision on the court trial is objective, because of the unique management system and distorted legal culture of the media and the court in our country. It is the root cause of the conflict between the two. However, the ultimate aim of media supervision and court trial is the same. Moderate media supervision can promote the justice of the trial and eliminate undue interference. In turn, the court is open. A fair trial also helps to promote the development of the right of media supervision. Therefore, while the media and journalists exercise self-discipline, it is also necessary to change the attitude of judges and adjust the open system of court trials. Obligations are defined to establish a benign interactive relationship between them. This paper is divided into five parts:. The introduction points out the origin of the research problem, the research method and the collection method of materials. The first chapter demonstrates the current situation of the relationship between media supervision and court trials through interviews with journalists, judges, questionnaires, and the collection of relevant types of cases over the past ten years. Explore the media in the supervision of the court trial of improper comments on the court's trial impact. The second chapter analyzes the current situation of the conflict between media supervision and court trial, not only because of the different understanding of the two administrative systems and judges, but also because of the different understanding of journalists on the same issues. Anachronism of existing regulations and lack of relevant laws are another important cause of conflict. The third chapter expounds the role and value of freedom of speech and fair trial in the society of democracy and rule of law, and makes a dialectical analysis of the relationship between media supervision and court trial with the theory of jurisprudence, which lays a theoretical foundation for the solution of the next step. Chapter 4th through the introduction of the extraterritorial experience, combined with the author interviews, the results of the questionnaire survey on the basis of the results of the media and its practitioners through the self-discipline and restraint, the adjustment of the court disclosure system and the transformation of the thinking of judges. In addition, the improvement of relevant laws to achieve mutual respect, mutual promotion of the benign state of interaction.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D90-052

【参考文献】