“北雁云依”案中姓名决定权法律分析

发布时间：2018-03-12 23:31

本文选题：姓名决定权　切入点：利益冲突　出处：《甘肃政法学院》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文以“北雁云依”案中创设姓氏为出发点,研究姓名权中的决定权。决定权分为“称姓权”和“取名权”,追溯姓名源流可以发现姓氏的功能远远大于名的功能,故本文重点研究“称姓权”。经过对有关姓名权的法律规范进行梳理,发现我国法律只有关于姓名决定权的粗略规定而没有具体划分,对于姓名权的规制仅限于简单的用字规范,这些显然是不足以应对实践的。通过对姓名权法律属性的分析得出公权力介入姓名决定权规制的原则。以权力和权利的视角探讨公权力机关介入姓名决定权的合理性。同时姓名的决定权与姓名权的规制还体现的是个人利益与国家利益、社会利益之间的冲突,这些冲突归结为一点就是自由价值与秩序价值之间的关系问题,在解决这些冲突的时候要充分考虑各种因素,不能简单的依据价值位阶原则进行取舍,我们最终的目的是寻求一种平衡,既能保障自由又能维护秩序。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the author studies the decision of the right of name in the case of "Beiyan Yunyi". The decision is divided into "the right to name" and "right of naming". Tracing back to the origin of the name, we can find that the function of the surname is far greater than the function of the name. Therefore, this paper focuses on the study of "name right". After combing the legal norms about the right to name, it is found that the law of our country has only rough provisions on the right to decide the name without any specific division, and the regulation of the right of name name is limited to the simple standard of using words. These are obviously not enough to deal with practice. Through the analysis of the legal attribute of name right, the principle of public power to intervene in name decision is obtained. To discuss the combination of public power in name decision from the angle of power and right. Rationality. At the same time, the decision of name and the regulation of name also reflect the interests of the individual and the country. The conflicts between social interests, which can be summed up as the relationship between the value of freedom and the value of order, should take into account all kinds of factors when resolving these conflicts, and can not simply be chosen according to the principle of value rank. Our ultimate goal is to find a balance that guarantees both freedom and order.
【学位授予单位】：甘肃政法学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D920.5;D923

【相似文献】