中国传统法律文化的多值逻辑及其现代意涵

发布时间：2018-03-13 07:04

本文选题：多值逻辑　切入点：礼法合流　出处：《学术交流》2016年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：为了回应韦伯对中国传统法律文化的误读,林端在方法论上批判了韦伯的二元对立思考方式,列举了中国传统法律文化的五种多值逻辑,即以"例"补"律"、"情""理""法"同为法律规范、"官方审判"与"民间调解"并行、"官方审判"和"民间调解"与"神判"互补、"国家法律"与"民间习惯"同为法源。但这五者其实只是"情理法融通"和"国家法与民间法统一"这两种多值逻辑的反复论述。实际上,中国传统法律文化还有一种更为基本的多值逻辑,即"礼法合流"。"礼法合流""情理法融通""国家法与民间法统一"是以儒家伦理为基础的多种法源、多种纠纷解决方式并存的法律多元主义,这三种多值逻辑所对应的分别是法律的道德基础、渊源、普遍性。无论是从西方法理学层面还是从现代中国法律实践层面看,三种多值逻辑现象都存在着颇具现代意涵的特征,这也是一种中国法律特殊现代性的体现。
[Abstract]:In response to Weber's misreading of Chinese traditional legal culture, Lin Duan criticizes Weber's dual opposites in methodology and enumerates five kinds of multi-valued logic of Chinese traditional legal culture. That is to say, taking "law" as an example, "emotion" "reason" "law" as legal norm, "official trial" and "folk mediation" parallel, "official trial" and "folk mediation" and "divine judgment" complement each other, "national law" and "folk custom" are the same as "folk custom". But these five people are in fact only two kinds of multi-valued logic, that is, "the fusion of reason and reason" and "unification of state law and folk law". In fact, There is also a more basic multi-valued logic in Chinese traditional legal culture, that is, "confluence of etiquette and law", "combination of propriety and law", "fusion of reason and law", "unification of state law and folk law" is a variety of legal sources based on Confucian ethics. Legal pluralism with multiple dispute resolution methods corresponds to the moral basis, origin and universality of law, both from the perspective of western jurisprudence and from the perspective of modern Chinese legal practice. The three multivalued logic phenomena all have the characteristic of modern meaning, which is also the embodiment of the special modernity of Chinese law.
【作者单位】：哈尔滨工程大学人文社会科学学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目“韦伯与中国文化”(14ASH002) 哈尔滨工程大学中央高校自由探索项目“中国传统法律文化‘多值逻辑’与现代法治建设”(HEUCF20151306)
【分类号】：D90-052

【相似文献】