法家精神:价值与缺失

发布时间：2018-04-05 14:36

本文选题：法家　切入点：霸道　出处：《中国人民大学学报》2014年02期

【摘要】：先秦法家之崛起,是欲谋变法图强、以法治秩序替代传统礼治秩序的一次积极努力。如果抛开其中的专制主义、"除阴奸"等不良成分,其与时俱进的变革精神、按规则办事的理性精神和"大公无私"的正义主张在当下依然具有重要的借鉴价值。尽管如此,由于法家的富强之路是建立在国富民穷、国强民弱的"零和博弈"之上的,因此,只有冲破这一怪圈,充分发扬民众的能动性和自我觉醒意识,才有可能真正走向富强之路。同时,法家"崇公抑私"的观念在后世的演化中,不仅表现出"假公济私"的欺骗性质,更导致"公"对"私"的肆意侵吞和民众权益的极度萎缩。为此,需要妥善处理"公"与"私"的冲突和矛盾,真正实现二者的统一和相得益彰。
[Abstract]:The rise of Legalists in the pre-Qin Dynasty is an active effort to reform the law and replace the traditional rule of law with the rule of law.If we put aside the despotism, the bad elements such as "eliminating Yin and traitorous" and so on, its spirit of change with the times, the rational spirit of handling affairs according to the rules and the just proposition of "selflessness" still have important reference value in the present.Nevertheless, since the path of Legalists to prosperity and strength is based on the "zero-sum game" between the rich and the poor, the strong and the weak, the only way to break through this strange circle is to give full play to the people's initiative and self-awareness.It is possible to really go to the road of prosperity and strength.At the same time, the concept of "worship of the public and suppress private" in later generations not only showed the deceptive nature of "imitating public interests", but also led to wanton embezzlement of "private" and atrophy of public rights and interests.Therefore, it is necessary to properly deal with the conflicts and contradictions between public and private, so as to realize their unity and mutual benefit.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学哲学院;
【基金】：教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-11-0502) 中国人民大学面上重点项目“中国传统管理思想研究”(10XNA010)
【分类号】：B226;D909.2

【参考文献】