日本裁判员制度探析

发布时间：2018-04-05 15:21

本文选题：日本裁判员　切入点：陪审制度　出处：《苏州大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：陪审制度因其能够促进司法公正、民主,体现司法权威,对公权力的滥用起到一定的限制作用,成为近现代法制社会民众直接参与国家司法活动最典型的一种形式。而日本于2004年5月21日制定了《关于裁判员参与刑事裁判的法律》,并在经过了五年的准备和宣传之后,于2009年5月21日起正式实施。日本的裁判员制度是旨在提高国民对司法的理解和信赖,而设计的在日本国民中选任裁判员与法官一起共同参与地方法院一审刑事诉讼程序的一项刑事诉讼制度。它作为一种日本在停止实施陪审制六十多年后又重新建立的司法改革制度,其实施原因在于它能体现程序正义、司法民主和司法信赖、并在一定程度上能帮助日本走出其当今司法制度的困境,即司法的过于精密和司法官僚主义。整部《关于裁判员参与刑事裁判的法律》分为八章:第一章总则介绍了制定本法的目的和意义。第二章裁判员,分为三节规定了裁判员的选任和解任资格、方式和程序。第三章裁判员参与审判的程序,包括审判准备及准备程序。第四章评议。第五章区分审理决定及审判特例。第六章裁判员等的保护措施。第七章杂则。第八章罚则及最后的附则。笔者在本文第二章重点系统介绍日本这部裁判员法的内容,并通过其与大陆法系及英美法系国家的陪审制的比较和日本本国的有关争论,对该法作出一定的理解和分析。笔者于第三章首先对日本在裁判员制度问题上表现出的正反意见做一个简要介绍,在此基础上剖析我国目前人民陪审员制度的本质和实施现状,并通过与日本裁判员法的比较,试图探索一些对完善我国人民陪审员制度有益的经验,并在适用案件、人民陪审员的选任、人民陪审员的权利和义务、对人民陪审员的保护、社会环境和配套制度等方面提出一些改进和完善的构想。最后在对陪审制在世界范围内的运行情况和趋势作出简要分析后,提出我国人民陪审员制度改革的基本方向和趋势,希望以此来使我国的人民陪审员制度能得到改善和成熟。
[Abstract]:Because of the jury system can promote judicial justice, democracy, reflecting the judicial authority, to certain restrictions on the abuse of public power has become a form of modern legal society people directly participate in the national judicial activities of the most typical. Japan was established in May 21, 2004 to participate in the law > < criminal judgment, and in after five years of preparation and propaganda, formally implemented from May 21, 2009. The Japanese National Jury system is designed to improve understanding and trust in the judiciary, a criminal litigation system and the design of the Japanese people in the selection of judges and judges together to participate in the local court of criminal proceedings. It is a kind of Japan to stop the implementation of the jury system more than 60 years after the re establishment of the judicial system reform, the reason is that it reflects the procedural justice, judicial democracy and judicial trust, And to a certain extent, can help Japan out of its current justice system dilemma, namely justice is too sophisticated and judicial bureaucracy. The whole "about jury in criminal adjudication law > is divided into eight chapters: the first chapter introduces the purpose and significance of this law. The second chapter judge, is divided into three sections the provisions of the selection and dismissal of judges qualifications, methods and procedures. The third chapter judges in the trial procedure, including trial preparation and preparation procedure. The fourth chapter review. The fifth chapter differentiates the trial decision and the trial case. The sixth chapter judges protection measures. In the seventh chapter. The eighth chapter is miscellaneous penalties and final in the annex. This method introduces the Japanese referee in the second chapter of this paper focuses on the system's content, and by the debate and comparison of jury system of civil law and common law and Japan, the method to make certain Understanding and analysis. The author in the third chapter of the pros and cons of Japan in the referee system showed on the issue made a brief introduction, based on the analysis of China's current nature of the people's jury system and the implementation of the status quo, and by comparison with the Japanese referee method, attempts to explore on improving the people's jury system in China the beneficial experience, and in the case, the selection of jurors, rights and obligations of the people's jury, protection of the people's assessors, and puts forward some ideas of improving and perfecting the social environment and supporting system and so on. At last make a brief Analysis on operation situation and trend of the jury system in the world. Put forward the basic direction and trend of China's jury system reform, hoping to make the Chinese people's assessor system can be improved and mature.

【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D931.3;DD915.3

【参考文献】