承继的共犯理论之新发展

发布时间：2018-04-18 12:51

本文选题：承继的共同正犯 + 因果共犯论　；参考：《法学》2017年03期

【摘要】：对于是否应肯定承继共犯的问题,现在主要是部分肯定承继的"中间说"与全面否定承继的"消极说"之间的对立。日本最高裁判所2012年的决定是其第一次就该问题做出的判断,促进了承继共犯理论的新发展。在"中间说"的理论根据并不充分的背景下,可以采取的理论结构是,以肯定先行为人存在作为义务为前提,认定通过共谋参与先行为人行为的后行为人与先行为人共有这种作为义务。为此,后行为人成立抢劫罪、敲诈勒索罪或者诈骗罪的不作为犯,并与属于作为犯的先行为人之间成立这些犯罪的共同正犯。这一结论是以后行为人仅就共谋参与之后的事实承担罪责为前提,不仅是妥当的,而且也与因果共犯论之间具有整合性。
[Abstract]:As to the question of whether to confirm the succession of accomplices, there is mainly the opposition between the "intermediate theory" and the negative-inheriting "negative theory".The decision of Japan Supreme Court in 2012 is its first judgment on this issue, which promotes the new development of the theory of inheriting accomplice.Under the background that the theoretical basis of "intermediate theory" is not sufficient, the theoretical structure can be taken as the premise of affirming the existence of the prior actor as the obligation.The author holds that the former actor and the former actor share the obligation to act through collusion.For this reason, the perpetrator establishes the crime of robbery, extortion or crime of fraud, and establishes the joint principal offender of these crimes with the first person who belongs to the crime of act.This conclusion is not only appropriate, but also integrated with the theory of causal accomplice.
【作者单位】：日本最高裁判所;东京大学;苏州大学王健法学院;
【基金】：2013年度教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“共谋射程理论:共犯研究的一种新路径”(项目编号:13YJA820051)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D931.3;DD914

【相似文献】