法律规范冲突的逻辑性质

发布时间：2018-04-22 22:41

本文选题：逻辑 + 语义学规范　；参考：《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2016年06期

【摘要】：法律规范之间的冲突是不是逻辑矛盾的问题是法律逻辑的前提性难题之一。凯尔森对这一问题的观点经过两次转变,最终采纳了否定说。但作为否定说主要支柱的效力论据误解了逻辑的性质及其适用的领域,弱化"效力"概念的做法只是转移或掩盖了问题,只有在区分规范的两种观念基础上彻底脱离"效力"概念才能走出困境。逻辑法则适用于法律规范间的冲突有其认知必要性与实践必要性。在此理论准备之下,肯定说能够证明,规范冲突可以被直接呈现或还原为逻辑矛盾的两种基本形式,即道义内部矛盾(反对性矛盾)与道义外部矛盾(对立性矛盾)。逻辑只适用于语义学规范的领域,但基于实践理性的假定,它对于规范创设者的行为同样会发生约束。
[Abstract]:Whether the conflict between legal norms is a logical contradiction is one of the leading problems of legal logic. Kelsen's view on this issue changed twice, and finally adopted the negative theory. But the argument for effectiveness as the main pillar of negation misunderstands the nature of logic and the areas of its application, and the weakening of the concept of "effectiveness" merely diverts or conceals the problem. Only on the basis of distinguishing the two concepts of norms can we break away from the concept of "effectiveness" completely. It is necessary to recognize and practice that the logic law is applicable to the conflict between legal norms. Under the preparation of this theory, it is certain to prove that normative conflicts can be directly presented or reduced to two basic forms of logical contradictions, namely, the internal contradiction of morality (contradiction of opposition) and the contradiction of external contradiction of morality (contradiction of opposites). Logic is only applicable to the field of semantic norms, but based on the assumption of practical rationality, it also constrains the behavior of the norm-creators.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学法理学研究所;
【基金】：中国政法大学优秀中青年教师培养支持资助项目国家社科基金青年项目(13CFX007)“法律规范的元理论研究”
【分类号】：D901

【相似文献】