当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 法理论文 >

中国古代判词的情理与文采

发布时间:2018-04-23 13:08

  本文选题:古代判词 + 情理 ; 参考:《湘潭大学》2017年博士论文


【摘要】:中国古代判词就是中国古代的“裁判文书”,是我国历代司法官员以法律为依据对是非曲直的判断与评价所得出的结论。能够正确适用法律、能有效说服两造、最大程度地教化社会的判词堪称好判词,好判词的说理要既合“情理”又具“文采”。本文共分为七章。第一章为“绪论”。第一节首先介绍了选题的意义,指出本选题的意义在于分析和挖掘中国古代判词里的“情理”和“文采”,裨益于今日裁判文书质量的改善。第二节介绍了古代判词“情理”和“文采”的国内外研究述评;第三节介绍了本文的研究思路和创新之处,本文尝试对判词的说理艺术和判词的文学性进行法学与文学双重特性的跨界研究。第二章为“中国古代判词的概貌、逻辑和说理模式”。第一节介绍了中国古代判词概貌。第二节介绍了中国古代判词的逻辑,中国古代判词最富有逻辑性,在说理中往往寓简洁生动于精密严谨、寓人文关怀于法律条文、寓文学性于逻辑性。第三节介绍了中国古代判词的说理模式,中国古代判词说理往往会诉诸情感、诉诸典故、诉诸道德、诉诸文化。第三章为“唐代判词的情理与文采”。唐判“文辞华丽、语句典雅”,是我国判词发展史上第一座丰碑,骈判作为一种文体正式确立。第一节介绍了唐代判词概貌。第二节以《龙筋凤髓判》为典型对唐判进行考察,唐判谋篇布局精细完整,文辞藻饰骈丽浮华,用典巧妙。第三节以《甲乙判》为典型对唐判进行考察,《甲乙判》的语言上善用比喻、多用典故、文辞简练、表达准确、说理充分,《甲乙判》里的情理表现为引经决狱、以民为本,《甲乙判》里的礼法表现为法有驰张、礼法迭相为用。第四章为“宋代判词的情理与文采”。宋代流行散判,判词说理条分缕析、重视对事实的认定,且引律为判、说服力强,宋判是我国判词发展史上第二座丰碑。第一节介绍了宋代判词概貌。第二节以《名公书判清明集》为典型对宋判进行考察,《名公书判清明集》在语体上辞尚体要、圆通博约、言浅情真,《名公书判清明集》里的情理表现为对法意与人情关系的把握和在具体案件中对情理的探询与分析。第五章为“明代判词的情理与文采”。第一节介绍了明代判词概貌。第二节以《折狱新语》为典型对明判进行考察,言语的情感化趋向和语言的形象化倾向是《折狱新语》的语言风格;在《折狱新语》的判词里,往往能看到司法审判对人情、世情和常理等情理因素的考虑;恤刑慎杀、刑罚适当、教化与息讼是体现在《折狱新语》中的司法理念。第六章为“清代判词的情理与文采”。第一节介绍了清代判词的概貌。第二节以《张船山判牍》为典型对清判进行考察,考察了《张船山判牍》的文学风貌与诗人性情、法律正义与道德教化、文学与司法的巧妙结合。第七章为“改善当今裁判文书质量的几点思考”。第一节介绍了当今我国裁判文书的现状。第二节介绍了影响我国当前裁判文书质量的观念因素、制度因素和制判主体因素。第三节提出了我国当前裁判文书质量改善的进路,具体在于改变轻视裁判文书制作的观念、建立健全相应配套制度、让裁判文书的说理富于“情理”和“文采”。
[Abstract]:The ancient Chinese referee is the "referee document" in ancient China. It is the conclusion that the judicial officials of our country have obtained from the judgment and evaluation of the right and wrong based on the law. It can apply the law correctly, can effectively persuade the two cases, and the greatest degree of teaching the judgment of the society can be called good judgment. This article is divided into seven chapters. The first chapter is the introduction. First section first introduces the significance of the topic, and points out that the significance of this topic is to analyze and excavate the "reason" and "literary grace" in the ancient Chinese judgments. The first section is beneficial to the improvement of the quality of today's referee's documents. The second section introduces the ancient judgments "reason" and "literary grace". In the third section, the author introduces the research ideas and innovations of this article. This article tries to carry out the cross boundary research on the dual characteristics of jurisprudence and literature. The second chapter is "the outline of ancient Chinese words, logic and reasoning model". The first section introduces the outline of ancient Chinese words. The second section introduces the logic of ancient Chinese words. The ancient Chinese words are most logical. In the reasoning, they often contain concise and precise, precise, precise and precise, the humanistic care in the legal provisions and the literariness of logic. The third section introduces the reasoning mode of ancient Chinese words, and the ancient Chinese words often appeal to emotion and resort to allusions. The third chapter is "the reason and the culture of the judgment of the Tang Dynasty". The Tang sentence "the magnificent words and the elegance" is the first monument in the history of the Chinese word judgment and the formal establishment of the parallel sentence as a style. The first section introduces the general appearance of the Tang Dynasty. The second section is a typical study of the Tang sentence with the Dragon Phoenix judgment. In the third section, the language of the first and the second is a typical example of the Tang sentence, and the language of "the first and the second" is used as a metaphor. The fourth chapter is "the reason and the literary appreciation of the Song Dynasty." the Song Dynasty's popular judgment, the judgment of the truth, the law as the judgment, the strong persuasion, the song judgment is the second monument in the history of the Chinese word development. The first section introduces the general appearance of the Song Dynasty's judgment. The second section takes the "the name of the public book to judge Qingming collection" as the second section. A typical study of the song sentence is carried out. The fifth chapter is "the reason and the literary criticism of the Ming Dynasty." the first section introduces the Ming Dynasty. The second section makes a survey on the new language of "the new language of imprisonment". The emotional tendency of speech and the tendency to visualize the language are the language style of the neologism. In the judgment of the neologism, the judiciary can often see the consideration of the human, the world and the normal factors in the judgment of the judiciary; the punishment is prudent, the punishment is appropriate, and the teaching is civilized. The sixth chapter introduces the general appearance of the Qing Dynasty's judgment. The first section introduces the general appearance of the Qing Dynasty's judgment. The second section takes Zhang Chuanshan Du Du as a typical case of the Qing Dynasty, and examines the literary style and the poet's nature, the legal justice and the moral education, the literature and the Department. The seventh chapter is "Some Thoughts on improving the quality of today's referee documents". The first section introduces the present situation of our country's referee documents. The second section introduces the concept factors, institutional factors and main factors that affect the quality of the current referee documents in our country. The third section puts forward the improvement of the quality of the current referee's documents in our country. The way is to change the concept of despising the production of judicial documents, establish and improve the corresponding supporting system, and make the reasoning of judicial documents rich in "reason" and "literary grace".

【学位授予单位】:湘潭大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D929

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 拉毛;;从《甲乙判》看唐代判词的语言特点[J];青海民族大学学报(社会科学版);2010年04期

2 拉毛;;唐代判词与士人价值观——以白居易《甲乙判》为例[J];时代文学(下半月);2012年12期

3 崔明石;;事实与规范之间:情理法的再认识——以《名公书判清明集》为考察依据[J];当代法学;2010年06期

4 刘小明;;《名公书判清明集》所见南宋亲属间诉讼[J];唐山学院学报;2012年05期

5 孔学;《名公书判清明集》所引宋代法律条文述论[J];河南大学学报(社会科学版);2003年02期

6 崔明石;;情理法的正当性:以“情”为核心的阐释———以《名公书判清明集》为考察依据[J];吉林师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2011年02期

7 郑颖慧;;《名公书判清明集》中奁产诉讼探析[J];保定学院学报;2013年02期

8 王志强;《名公书判清明集》法律思想初探[J];法学研究;1997年05期

9 唐智燕;;《名公书判清明集》数字名探析[J];汉语史研究集刊;2008年00期

10 郭东旭;李婕;;南宋蔡杭法律思想探析——以《名公书判清明集》为中心[J];宋史研究论丛;2007年00期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 刘文基;谈笑间,蹊跷案件水落石出[N];上海法治报;2012年

相关博士学位论文 前2条

1 黄霞(黄侠);中国古代判词的情理与文采[D];湘潭大学;2017年

2 刘小明;唐宋判文研究[D];华东师范大学;2012年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 唐楠;从白居易判词看唐代婚姻家庭制度[D];黑龙江大学;2015年

2 张凤雷;《名公书判清明集》中民事判词的情理法研究[D];郑州大学;2016年

3 洪毓敏;《名公书判清明集》中关于民事经济诉讼的研究[D];云南大学;2016年

4 王小飞;宋代女性诉讼问题研究[D];南开大学;2016年

5 胡月明;从《名公书判清明集》看南宋的情理法[D];吉林大学;2007年

6 王麟;从《名公书判清明集》看南宋妇女的守寡与再嫁[D];中国政法大学;2005年

7 高见;从《名公书判清明集》看宋代判词的特点和精神指向[D];吉林大学;2007年

8 赵炎;从《名公书判清明集》看南宋名公的审判理念[D];安徽大学;2015年

9 汪初芸;《名公书判清明集》中所见南宋女性诉讼[D];西南政法大学;2006年

10 胡琼;从《名公书判清明集》看南宋典卖纠纷与诉讼解决[D];海南大学;2012年



本文编号:1792103

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/1792103.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户54b61***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com