口供的自由、自愿原则研究——法国模式及评价

发布时间：2018-04-28 21:24

本文选题：口供 + 自由、自愿原则　；参考：《比较法研究》2017年03期

【摘要】：受欧洲人权法院的压力,法国于2011年出台了《刑事拘留法》,明确了口供的自由、自愿原则。在内容上,口供自由、自愿原则包括权利告知、获取口供的合法性限制以及非法口供排除的自由评价。从制度设计上,法国式的口供自由、自愿原则具有三大特点:以判例为主导的非法口供排除规则体系、"相对无效为主、绝对无效为辅"的排除标准以及以中立司法官为主要的权力监督机构。尽管口供的自由、自愿原则已在法国扎根并日渐成熟,但仍带有浓厚的职权主义色彩。从根本而论,"社会利益优先"、"国家权力主导"、"追求实质真实"等核心目标在法国刑事诉讼中未发生根本变化,公权力机构在刑事司法体系中还处于较优势的地位。
[Abstract]:Under pressure from the European Court of Human Rights, France introduced the Criminal Detention Act in 2011, which clarifies the principle of free and voluntary confessions. In content, freedom of confession, voluntary principle includes the right to inform, the limitation of the legality of obtaining confession and the free evaluation of the exclusion of illegal confession. In terms of system design, the principle of freedom of confession in French style and voluntary principle have three characteristics: the rule system of illegal confession exclusion, which is dominated by case law, is relatively invalid. Exclusion criteria for absolute invalidity and neutral magistrates as the main supervisory authority. Although the freedom of confession and the principle of volunteerism have taken root and matured in France, there is still a strong sense of authoritarianism. Fundamentally speaking, the core goals of "social interests first", "state power leading" and "pursuing substantial truth" have not fundamentally changed in French criminal proceedings, and the public power institutions are still in a more advantageous position in the criminal justice system.
【作者单位】： "2011
【分类号】：D956.5;DD915.3

【相似文献】