行业协会惩戒权初探
发布时间:2018-04-30 17:25
本文选题:行业协会 + 惩戒权 ; 参考:《湘潭大学》2011年硕士论文
【摘要】:20世纪80年代以来,我国行业协会得到了长足的发展,在社会中的作用也越来越重要,极大促进了经济社会的发展。但是我们必须清醒地看到行业协会的发展与市场经济的内在要求相比还是存在一定的差距,现状可谓不容乐观。这其中既有行业协会自身的缺陷,也有政府层面存在的问题,比如行业协会的自律性有待加强,而政府尤其是相关的立法没有跟进,导致两者之间的矛盾逐渐加深。笔者仔细观察行业协会现在的发展状况,存在的比较严重的问题是行业协会在行使惩戒权过程中产生了纠纷,不仅包括协会与成员之间的纠纷,还包括协会与第三人之间的纠纷。惩戒的措施是多样的,包括开除资格、市场禁入、罚款、名誉惩戒等,其中有些措施对于违规者的惩戒是非常严厉的,有的直接损害违规者的生活与机会自由。有权利就必须有救济,相应的救济机制尚不完善,可谓任重而道远。 对于救济机制的探讨,可以考虑从行业协会惩戒权的权力来源进行分析,根据权利法律授权、政府委托以及契约让渡这三种方式来源,采取相对应的救济渠道包括行政诉讼救济机制、仲裁机制、调解机制等,并在此基础上细致探讨各救济渠道的可行性。
[Abstract]:Since the 1980s, China's trade associations have developed rapidly and played an increasingly important role in society, which greatly promoted the economic and social development. But we must soberly see that there is still a certain gap between the development of trade associations and the inherent requirements of the market economy, and the present situation is not optimistic. There are not only the defects of the trade association itself, but also the problems in the government level. For example, the self-discipline of the trade association needs to be strengthened, and the government, especially the relevant legislation, has not followed up, leading to the deepening of the contradiction between the two. The author carefully observes the current development situation of the trade association. The more serious problem is that the trade association has produced disputes in the process of exercising its disciplinary power, not only the disputes between the association and its members, It also includes disputes between associations and third parties. Disciplinary measures are diverse, including dismissal, market entry, fines, reputation, and so on, some of which are very severe to the punishment of violators, and some directly damage the freedom of life and opportunity of the violators. Right must have relief, the corresponding relief mechanism is not perfect, it is a heavy task and a long way to go. For the discussion of the relief mechanism, we can consider analyzing the power source of the disciplinary power of the trade association, according to the legal authorization of the right, the government entrusting and the contract transferring these three kinds of sources. The corresponding relief channels include administrative litigation relief mechanism, arbitration mechanism, mediation mechanism and so on. On this basis, the feasibility of each relief channel is discussed in detail.
【学位授予单位】:湘潭大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D920.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 谢邦华,李楠;对当前行业协会发展问题的思考[J];河北科技大学学报(社会科学版);2004年04期
2 黎军;;行业协会的几个基本问题[J];河北法学;2006年07期
3 方洁;社团罚则的设定与边界[J];法学;2005年01期
4 董泽文;关于我国行业协会建设与发展的几点思考[J];前沿;2004年03期
5 张小玲;刑事诉讼中的“程序分流”[J];政法论坛;2003年02期
6 甫玉龙,黄凤兰;行业协会的法律定位及社会功能[J];中国行政管理;2005年05期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 孙丽军;行业协会的制度逻辑[D];复旦大学;2004年
2 孙芳;中国行业协会发展方向研究[D];对外经济贸易大学;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 胡霁云;我国行业协会法律规制的基本问题研究[D];华中科技大学;2004年
2 靳扣娟;行业协会法律问题研究[D];北方工业大学;2004年
3 宋子慧;中国行业协会立法研究[D];中共中央党校;2004年
4 沈苗苗;行业协会惩戒权的行政法律规制研究[D];中国政法大学;2007年
,本文编号:1825487
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/1825487.html