基层普法存在的问题及对策研究

发布时间：2018-05-02 11:05

本文选题：基层普法 + 存在问题　；参考：《吉林大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：中国共产党第十八届中央委员会第四次全体会议通过了《中共中央关于全面推进依法治国若干重大问题的决定》，在全会公报中，使用频率最高的“法”字，出现了103次，可见法制工作已经成为我国当前最大的政治。从1986年“一五”普法到即将在2015年结束的“六五普法”，中国的普法教育经历了近三十年的发展历程。普法宣传取得了众所瞩目的成绩，从法律意识培养、知法水平掌握程度和用法能力提升这些方面，都取得了不错的效果。法治政府和法制社会建设都取得了显著进展，为保障和促进经济社会快速发展，推进依法治国方略的实施起到了巨大作用。根据多年的基层工作和切身感受，笔者认为，以政府为主体推进的普法教育在组织和实施的过程中，在法制教育实效方面还存在很多不容忽视的问题，面对社会发展和当前的政治经济生活情势，，需要重新审视和改进的地方还有很多，因此萌生了结合实际分析基层普法问题的想法。本文共分三个部分论述，第一部分“基层普法教育现状”运用调查分析法，从历史层面和现实层面，描述分析基层普法教育中，主体、内容、形式、课题等各个方面的总体情况，力求详实、严谨，符合当前的社会特征。第二部分主要分析基层普法当中存在的问题。在基层普法的现实情境当中，普法主体形态比较单一，多为党政事业单位和机关团体，各个部门职责交叉界限不清晰，各部门主体对普法教育的重视程度不一，基层普法人员自身的法律素养和业务水平也参差不齐。在普法内容上，法律体系本身就比较庞杂，所以普法教育本身也容易流于程式化、运动化、来去一阵风。这就容易造成普法教育形式主义问题很突出。基层普法缺少新颖的形式，也缺少固定的模式。此外，对普法效果的考核评估，也存在着走过场，重规模轻实效的问题。而普法对象则处于被动的地位，因为以上因素的综合制约，造成其本身对普法教育缺少热情或心态抵触。加上社会形势的复杂，往往还会有一些普法对象“信访不信法”。第三部分重点论述重新审视基层普法工作的价值和意义，提出在提高全民的法律素质和加快全社会的法制化进程的这个目标前提下，如何针对查找出的问题，提出切实可行，符合新媒体时代发展规律和普法对象认知心理的意见、建议和方法。这些方法主要是，在新的历史形势下将普法工作进行新的定位，变政治任务为素质教育和专项服务，动员全社会的力量，根据各自的资源和特点投入到普法工作中去，普法形式要与时俱进。为增强普法工作实效，要把法律服务、文化活动和社会管理，都融合进普法工作之中。
[Abstract]:At the fourth plenary session of the 18th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, the CPC Central Committee adopted the "decision of the CPC Central Committee on promoting the Rule of Law in an All-round way." in the communique of the plenary session, the word "law", which is the most frequently used, appeared 103 times. Visible legal system work already became our country current biggest politics. From "the first five year plan" in 1986 to the "sixth five year law popularization" in 2015, the popularization of law education in China has gone through nearly 30 years of development. The popularization of law has made great achievements, and good results have been obtained from the cultivation of legal consciousness, the improvement of the level of knowledge and the improvement of the ability to use the law. The government ruled by law and the construction of legal society have made remarkable progress, which has played a great role in ensuring and promoting the rapid development of economy and society and promoting the implementation of the strategy of governing the country according to law. Based on years of grass-roots work and personal feelings, the author believes that there are still many problems that can not be ignored in the practical effect of legal education in the process of organizing and implementing the popularizing legal education, which is promoted by the government as the main body. In the face of social development and the current situation of political and economic life, there are still many areas that need to be re-examined and improved. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part, "the present situation of popularizing law education at the grass-roots level", uses the investigation and analysis method to describe and analyze the main body, content and form of the basic level law popularization education from the historical level and the realistic level. Subject and other aspects of the overall situation, strive to be detailed, rigorous, in line with the current social characteristics. The second part mainly analyzes the existing problems in basic law popularization. In the realistic situation of popularizing the law at the grass-roots level, the subject form of the law popularization is relatively single, most of them are party and government institutions and organizations, the cross boundary of the responsibilities of each department is not clear, and the main body of each department pays different attention to the education of popularizing law. The legal literacy and professional level of the legal personnel at the grassroots level are also uneven. In the content of popularizing law, the legal system itself is rather complicated, so the education of popularizing law itself is easy to flow in stylization, movement, and a gust of wind. This is easy to cause the legal education formalism problem is very prominent. The basic level popularizes the law lacks the novel form, also lacks the fixed pattern. In addition, the evaluation of the effectiveness of law popularization, there is also a problem of formality, emphasis on scale and effectiveness. The object of popularizing law is in a passive position, because of the comprehensive restriction of the above factors, it lacks enthusiasm or resistance to the education of popularizing law. In addition to the complexity of the social situation, there will often be some legal objects, "letter to visit or not to believe the law." The third part focuses on the value and significance of re-examining the grass-roots legal popularization work, and puts forward how to put forward practical and feasible solutions to the problems found under the premise of improving the legal quality of the whole people and speeding up the legalization process of the whole society. In line with the new media era development law and the cognitive psychology of the legal object opinions, suggestions and methods. These methods mainly include: under the new historical situation, the work of popularizing the law should be reoriented, political tasks should be changed into quality-oriented education and special services, the forces of the whole society should be mobilized, and their respective resources and characteristics should be put into the work of popularizing the law. The form of law popularization should keep pace with the times. In order to enhance the effectiveness of legal popularization, we should integrate legal services, cultural activities and social management into legal popularization.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D920.0

【参考文献】