美国反恐法律的实践及其借鉴

发布时间：2018-06-03 01:20

本文选题：美国反恐法律 + 国家安全　；参考：《法学》2017年07期

【摘要】：从2001年的《爱国者法案》到2015年的《自由法案》,美国的反恐立法发生了从强调扩大政府权力以有效打击恐怖活动向兼顾保护公民宪法权利的转变,对于反恐模式与诉讼程序、执法机关在国内搜集情报的特别权力与手段以及不断扩大电子监控范围的做法,立法者和法官也从最初的附条件支持、默认,到警觉和限制。美国反恐法律实践给予我国的启示是,任何反恐立法都要以寻求政府权力与公民权利之间的平衡为指导原则;政府权力的授予要由法律明确界定;法律内容应随着反恐实际情况的变化适时调整;司法机关要切实履行监督执法部门、保护公民权利的职责。
[Abstract]:From the Patriot Act of 2001 to the Freedom Act of 2015, the anti-terrorism legislation in the United States has changed from emphasizing the expansion of government power to effectively combating terrorist activities to taking into account the protection of citizens' constitutional rights. The special powers and tools of law enforcement agencies to gather intelligence at home and the practice of expanding the scope of electronic surveillance, legislators and judges also from the initial conditional support, acquiescence, to vigilance and restrictions. The enlightenment of American anti-terrorism legal practice is that any anti-terrorism legislation should be guided by seeking the balance between government power and civil rights, and the conferment of government power should be clearly defined by law. The content of the law should be adjusted with the change of the actual situation of anti-terrorism, and the judicial organ should carry out the duty of supervising the law enforcement department and protecting the citizen's rights.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“新疆地区反恐警务模式实证研究”(项目号:16XZZ007)阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D971.2;DD914

【相似文献】