网络诽谤与网络匿名之间的平衡

发布时间：2018-06-03 05:14

本文选题：网络诽谤 + 表达自由　；参考：《重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年05期

【摘要】：网络匿名极大地扩展了公民的表达自由,但是,其也为网络诽谤打开了方便之门。为了保护公民的名誉权,就需要披露匿名诽谤者的身份信息,然而,匿名言论也是受宪法保护的表达自由。因此,为了既保护名誉,又打击网络诽谤,同时也保护匿名言论,美国的法院根据网络的特殊性,结合其司法实践提出了若干标准协调两者之间的冲突:即原告必须履行通知程序;原告必须提供确切的证据证明被告的诽谤性言论构成侵权;披露匿名被告信息的命令有助于原告诉求的实现;无法从其他途径获取被告匿名身份信息。
[Abstract]:Internet anonymity greatly expands citizens' freedom of expression, but it also opens the door to internet libel. In order to protect citizens' right of reputation, it is necessary to disclose the identity of anonymous slander. However, anonymous speech is also the freedom of expression protected by the constitution. Therefore, in order to protect both reputation and libel on the Internet, as well as to protect anonymous speech, the courts in the United States, based on the particularity of the network, In combination with its judicial practice, several standards are proposed to reconcile the conflict between the two: the plaintiff must perform the notification procedure, the plaintiff must provide accurate evidence to prove that the defendant's defamatory remarks constitute infringement; The order to disclose the information of the anonymous defendant is helpful to the realization of the plaintiff's claim, and the anonymous identity information of the defendant can not be obtained from other ways.
【作者单位】：湖北警官学院;
【基金】：湖北省高校人文社会科学重点研究基地项目:网络诽谤言论的治理(2017-10)
【分类号】：D923;D971.2

【相似文献】